These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


188 related items for PubMed ID: 15898618

  • 1. Estimates of auditory filter phase response at and below characteristic frequency.
    Oxenham AJ, Ewert SD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):1713-6. PubMed ID: 15898618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Extending the domain of center frequencies for the compressive gammachirp auditory filter.
    Patterson RD, Unoki M, Irino T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1529-42. PubMed ID: 14514206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effects of a high-frequency suppressor on tuning curves and derived basilar-membrane response functions.
    Yasin I, Plack CJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):322-32. PubMed ID: 12880044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Auditory filter bandwidths in binaural and monaural listening conditions.
    Kollmeier B, Holube I.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1889-901. PubMed ID: 1401533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Psychophysical evidence for auditory compression at low characteristic frequencies.
    Plack CJ, Drga V.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1574-86. PubMed ID: 12656392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Estimating peripheral gain and compression using fixed-duration masking curves.
    Yasin I, Drga V, Plack CJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4145-55. PubMed ID: 23742366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cochlear compression: recent insights from behavioural experiments.
    Plack CJ.
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 787():31-8. PubMed ID: 23716206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Differences in loudness of positive and negative Schroeder-phase tone complexes as a function of the fundamental frequency.
    Mauermann M, Hohmann V.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):1028-39. PubMed ID: 17348525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evidence of upward spread of suppression in DPOAE measurements.
    Gorga MP, Neely ST, Dorn PA, Dierking D, Cyr E.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2910-20. PubMed ID: 12509012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Oxenham AJ, Plack CJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3666-75. PubMed ID: 9193054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Using the ideal observer to predict performance in perceptual tasks: an example from the auditory temporal masking domain.
    MacDonald JA.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2639-48. PubMed ID: 22006524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effect of interaural delay of the masker on masking-level differences in young and old adults.
    Pichora-Fuller MK, Schneider BA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2129-35. PubMed ID: 1597604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The structural and functional consequences of acoustic injury in the cochlea and peripheral auditory system: a five year update.
    Saunders JC, Cohen YE, Szymko YM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):136-46. PubMed ID: 1880281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Modulation masking produced by complex tone modulators.
    Verhey JL, Ewert SD, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2135-46. PubMed ID: 14587611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Parallels between frequency selectivity measured psychophysically and in cochlear mechanics.
    Moore BC.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1986 Oct; 25():139-52. PubMed ID: 3472318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Temporal structure model of binaural masking level difference.
    Albeck Y, Nebenzahl I, Lewis A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1389-93. PubMed ID: 1401525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Short-term temporal integration: evidence for the influence of peripheral compression.
    Oxenham AJ, Moore BC, Vickers DA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3676-87. PubMed ID: 9193055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effect of pure-tone forward masking on overshoot.
    Hicks ML, Bacon SP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):228-30. PubMed ID: 1880293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Basilar-membrane response to multicomponent stimuli in chinchilla.
    Rhode WS, Recio A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):981-94. PubMed ID: 11519623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. An alternate approach to constructing distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves.
    Johnson TA, Neely ST, Dierking DM, Hoover BM, Gorga MP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3263-6. PubMed ID: 15658675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.