These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

122 related items for PubMed ID: 1591117

  • 21. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS, Hagge MS, Broome JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Long-term use of dentine adhesive as an interfacial sealer under Class II amalgam restorations.
    Ben-Amar A, Liberman R, Judes H, Nordenberg D.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1990 Jan; 17(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2405127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Fracture resistance of four different restorations for cuspal replacement.
    Segura A, Riggins R.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Dec; 26(12):928-31. PubMed ID: 10620155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Amalgam repair: quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments.
    Cehreli SB, Arhun N, Celik C.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Dec; 35(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 20533635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Bonding amalgam to dentin by different methods.
    Hadavi F, Hey JH, Strasdin RB, McMeekin GP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Sep; 72(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 7965897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Comparison of retentiveness of amalgam bonding agent types.
    Winkler MM, Moore BK, Allen J, Rhodes B.
    Oper Dent; 1997 Sep; 22(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 9484142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents and pins in amalgam restorations.
    Imbery TA, Burgess JO, Batzer RC.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Jun; 126(6):753-9. PubMed ID: 7797731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The effect of different adhesive systems on the retention strength of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Ghavamnasiri M, Moosavi H.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb 01; 9(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 18264531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of cavity varnish and adhesive resin with amalgam.
    Sepetcioglu F, Ataman BA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb 01; 79(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 9513097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Effect of bonded amalgam restorations on microleakage.
    Al-Jazairy YH, Louka AN.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Feb 01; 24(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 10823065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.