These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

122 related items for PubMed ID: 1591117

  • 41.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Revisiting amalgam: a comparative study between bonded amalgam restoration and amalgam retained with undercuts.
    Gupta I, Gupta S, Kothari A.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 May 01; 12(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 22186810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Effect of a copal varnish, ZOE or glass ionomer cement bases on microleakage of amalgam restorations.
    Manders CA, Garcia-Godoy F, Barnwell GM.
    Am J Dent; 1990 Apr 01; 3(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 2076225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Amalgam repair: evaluation of bond strength and microleakage.
    Ozer F, Unlü N, Oztürk B, Sengun A.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Apr 01; 27(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 11931139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Amalgam retention using pins, boxes, and Amalgambond.
    Fischer GM, Stewart GP, Panelli J.
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug 01; 6(4):173-5. PubMed ID: 7803002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Microleakage in primary teeth restored by conventional or bonded amalgam technique.
    Myaki SI, Rodrigues CR, Raggio DP, Flores TA, Matson MR.
    Braz Dent J; 2001 Aug 01; 12(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 11696918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using Amalgambond and Copalite.
    Edgren BN, Denehy GE.
    Am J Dent; 1992 Dec 01; 5(6):296-8. PubMed ID: 1304174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Incorporation of adhesive liners in amalgam: effect on compressive strength and creep.
    Charlton DG, Murchison DF, Moore BK.
    Am J Dent; 1991 Aug 01; 4(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 1930843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK, Unlu N, Cetin AR, Ozkan HB.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Aug 01; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.