These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system. Marshall NW. Phys Med Biol; 2006 May 21; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems. Marshall NW. Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug 07; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors. Marshall NW, Mackenzie A, Honey ID. Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb 21; 56(4):979-99. PubMed ID: 21248386 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system. Monnin P, Gutierrez D, Bulling S, Lepori D, Verdun FR. Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct 07; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics. Cowen AR, Davies AG, Kengyelics SM. Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec 07; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems. Redlich U, Hoeschen C, Doehring W. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Dec 07; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system. Moro L, Pannella A, Bassetti C, Fantinato D, Baldi M, Bertoli G. Radiol Med; 2003 Dec 07; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging performance of the hybrid pixel detectors XPAD3-S. Brunner FC, Clemens JC, Hemmer C, Morel C. Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar 21; 54(6):1773-89. PubMed ID: 19258683 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of a 41 x 41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications. Granfors PR, Aufrichtig R, Possin GE, Giambattista BW, Huang ZS, Liu J, Ma B. Med Phys; 2003 Oct 21; 30(10):2715-26. PubMed ID: 14596310 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of x-ray detectors for mouse CT imaging. Goertzen AL, Nagarkar V, Street RA, Paulus MJ, Boone JM, Cherry SR. Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec 07; 49(23):5251-65. PubMed ID: 15656275 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics. Cowen AR, Kengyelics SM, Davies AG. Clin Radiol; 2008 May 07; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging. Samei E, Dobbins JT, Lo JY, Tornai MP. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 May 07; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A model for image formation and image quality prediction in diagnostic radiology. Kandarakis I, Cavouras D, Koutsourakis C, Triantis D, Bakas A, Panayiotakis G, Nomicos C. Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997 May 07; 43 Pt B():517-21. PubMed ID: 10179719 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of additive noise on system performance of a digital X-ray imaging system. Zhang D, Rong J, Chen WR, Gao F, Xu K, Wu X, Liu H. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan 07; 54(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 17260857 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]