These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
314 related items for PubMed ID: 15933152
1. Average glandular dose in routine mammography screening using a Sectra MicroDose Mammography unit. Hemdal B, Herrnsdorf L, Andersson I, Bengtsson G, Heddson B, Olsson M. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):436-43. PubMed ID: 15933152 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria. Hemdal B, Andersson I, Grahn A, Håkansson M, Ruschin M, Thilander-Klang A, Båth M, Börjesson S, Medin J, Tingberg A, Månsson LG, Mattsson S. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimisation of X-ray examinations in Lithuania: start of implementation in mammography. Adliene D, Adlys G, Cerapaite R, Jonaitiene E, Cibulskaite I. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15933145 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria. Vassileva J, Avramova-Cholakova S, Dimov A, Lichev A. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Towards a proposition of a diagnostic (dose) reference level for mammographic acquisitions in breast screening measurements in Belgium. Smans K, Bosmans H, Xiao M, Carton AK, Marchal G. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):321-6. PubMed ID: 16464839 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study. Koutalonis M, Delis H, Spyrou G, Costaridou L, Tzanakos G, Panayiotakis G. Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun 07; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of European protocol in the evaluation of contrast-to-noise ratio and mean glandular dose for two digital mammography systems. Muhogora WE, Devetti A, Padovani R, Msaki P, Bonutti F. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 Jun 07; 129(1-3):231-6. PubMed ID: 18283065 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector]. Gosch D, Jendrass S, Scholz M, Kahn T. Rofo; 2006 Jul 07; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations. Engelken FJ, Meyer H, Juran R, Bick U, Fallenberg E, Diekmann F. Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct 07; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography. Ullman G, Sandborg M, Dance DR, Yaffe M, Alm Carlsson G. Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul 07; 50(13):3143-52. PubMed ID: 15972986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Monte Carlo generated conversion factors for the estimation of average glandular dose in contact and magnification mammography. Koutalonis M, Delis H, Spyrou G, Costaridou L, Tzanakos G, Panayiotakis G. Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov 07; 51(21):5539-48. PubMed ID: 17047268 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]