These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

212 related items for PubMed ID: 15938067

  • 1. Double-vowel perception in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: differences in fundamental frequency, ear of presentation, and relative amplitude.
    Arehart KH, Rossi-Katz J, Swensson-Prutsman J.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 48(1):236-52. PubMed ID: 15938067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Role of fundamental frequency differences in the perceptual separation of competing vowel sounds by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss.
    Arehart KH, King CA, McLean-Mudgett KS.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 9430762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of cochlear hearing loss on perceptual grouping cues in competing-vowel perception.
    Rossi-Katz JA, Arehart KH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2588-98. PubMed ID: 16266179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. An Alternative Explanation for Difficulties with Speech in Background Talkers: Abnormal Fusion of Vowels Across Fundamental Frequency and Ears.
    Reiss LAJ, Molis MR.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Jul; 22(4):443-461. PubMed ID: 33877470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The influence of reduced audible bandwidth on asynchronous double-vowel identification.
    Valentine S, Lentz JJ.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1750-64. PubMed ID: 22615479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. FO processing and the separation of competing speech signals by listeners with normal hearing and with hearing loss.
    Summers V, Leek MR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Dec; 41(6):1294-306. PubMed ID: 9859885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V, Makashay MJ, Theodoroff SM, Leek MR.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effect of hearing loss on identification of asynchronous double vowels.
    Lentz JJ, Marsh SL.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1354-67. PubMed ID: 17197501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech.
    Ozmeral EJ, Buss E, Hall JW.
    PLoS One; 2016 Dec; 11(5):e0154920. PubMed ID: 27144601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Vowel identification by listeners with hearing impairment in response to variation in formant frequencies.
    Molis MR, Leek MR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Aug; 54(4):1211-23. PubMed ID: 21297168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Informational masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners: sensation level and decision weights.
    Alexander JM, Lutfi RA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2234-47. PubMed ID: 15532655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Temporal intraspeech masking of plosive bursts: effects of hearing loss and frequency shaping.
    Mackersie CL.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):554-63. PubMed ID: 17538099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Kidd G.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Auditory processing of vowels by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bacon SP, Brandt JF.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Sep; 25(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 7176605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The influence of talker differences on vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nábĕlek AK, Czyzewski Z, Krishnan LA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1228-46. PubMed ID: 1401512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of hearing impairment and presentation level on masking period patterns for Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes.
    Summers V.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2307-17. PubMed ID: 11108371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gregan MJ, Nelson PB, Oxenham AJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2895-912. PubMed ID: 24116426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Frequency glide discrimination in the F2 region by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Summers V, Leek MR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3825-32. PubMed ID: 7790660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC, Poroy O.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fusion of dichotic consonants in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listenersa).
    Sathe NC, Kain A, Reiss LAJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Jan 01; 155(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 38174963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.