These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
334 related items for PubMed ID: 15947235
1. Supreme Court strikes ban on private health insurance. Eggertson L. CMAJ; 2005 Jul 19; 173(2):139. PubMed ID: 15947235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Supreme disagreement: the highest court affirms an empty right. Flood CM, Sullivan T. CMAJ; 2005 Jul 19; 173(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 15967947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Private medical care comes to Canada. CMAJ; 2005 Aug 02; 173(3):225, 227. PubMed ID: 16076799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Chaoulli decision resonates one year later. Kondro W. CMAJ; 2006 Jul 04; 175(1):17. PubMed ID: 16818893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Chaoulli decision: a debate in which physicians must be heard. Ouellet R. CMAJ; 2005 Oct 11; 173(8):896. PubMed ID: 16217113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Private health insurance systems, constitution and the right to receive an equitable health care]. Zúñiga F A. Rev Med Chil; 2013 Apr 11; 141(4):514-8. PubMed ID: 23900373 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Private health insurance: in one door and out the other? CMAJ; 2005 Sep 13; 173(6):565, 567. PubMed ID: 16157709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Canadian Supreme Court upholds right to take out private health insurance. Spurgeon D. BMJ; 2005 Jun 18; 330(7505):1408. PubMed ID: 15961806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Just Medicare: the role of Canadian courts in determining health care rights and access. Flood CM. J Law Med Ethics; 2005 Aug 02; 33(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 16686238 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. CMA okays private health care for waiting patients. Sibbald B. CMAJ; 2005 Sep 13; 173(6):585. PubMed ID: 16109752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Inequalities in health care utilization in Spain due to double insurance coverage: An Oaxaca-Ransom decomposition. González Alvarez ML, Barranquero AC. Soc Sci Med; 2009 Sep 13; 69(5):793-801. PubMed ID: 19628322 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality v. equality: the divided court in Chaoulli v. Quebec. Yeo M, Lucock C. Health Law J; 2006 Sep 13; 14():129-50. PubMed ID: 17563960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]