These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

189 related items for PubMed ID: 15953524

  • 1. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Briaire JJ, Frijns JH.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):143-56. PubMed ID: 15953524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Rubinstein JT.
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 15732375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM, Brown CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
    Cohen LT.
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab.
    Bahmer A, Peter O, Baumann U.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug 15; 191(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 20558202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application].
    Xi X, Hong MD, Han DY, Huang DL, Yang WY.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb 15; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Stimulus level effects on neural excitation and eCAP amplitude.
    Westen AA, Dekker DM, Briaire JJ, Frijns JH.
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct 15; 280(1-2):166-76. PubMed ID: 21664959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H, Truy E, Charasse B, Boutitie F, Chanal JM, Cochard N, Piron JP, Ribas S, Deguine O, Fraysse B, Mondain M, Uziel A, Collet L.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec 15; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant].
    Yang H, Tang J, Cao K, Zhu X, Wang Y, Pan T.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct 15; 36(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 12761943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements.
    Vanpoucke FJ, Zarowski AJ, Peeters SA.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec 15; 51(12):2174-83. PubMed ID: 15605865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 5. refractory recovery and facilitation.
    Cohen LT.
    Hear Res; 2009 Feb 15; 248(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19110048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users].
    Zhu X, Cao K, Pan T, Yang H, Wang Y.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan 15; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Automatic analysis of auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential with an artificial neural network.
    Charasse B, Thai-Van H, Chanal JM, Berger-Vachon C, Collet L.
    Artif Intell Med; 2004 Jul 15; 31(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 15302088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA, Battmer RD, Pesch J.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec 15; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Electrical compound action potentials recorded with automated neural response telemetry: threshold changes as a function of time and electrode position.
    Spivak L, Auerbach C, Vambutas A, Geshkovich S, Wexler L, Popecki B.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb 15; 32(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 20686409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. amplitude growth functions.
    Bahmer A, Baumann U.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar 30; 205(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 22209768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of intra- versus post-operatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potentials.
    van Wermeskerken GK, van Olphen AF, van Zanten GA.
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct 30; 45(10):589-94. PubMed ID: 17062500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Response of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation: effects of high-rate pulse trains.
    Runge-Samuelson CL, Abbas PJ, Rubinstein JT, Miller CA, Robinson BK.
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug 30; 194(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 15276671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach.
    Briaire JJ, Frijns JH.
    Hear Res; 2006 Apr 30; 214(1-2):17-27. PubMed ID: 16520009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Estimation of stimulus attenuation in cochlear implants.
    Smit JE, Hanekom T, Hanekom JJ.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jun 15; 180(2):363-73. PubMed ID: 19464523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.