These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

582 related items for PubMed ID: 15953527

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ, Galvin JJ.
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17182877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Cross-modal plasticity and speech perception in pre- and postlingually deaf cochlear implant users.
    Buckley KA, Tobey EA.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):2-15. PubMed ID: 20829699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Blink reflex and auditory speech perception in prelingually cochlear-implanted children.
    Emamdjomeh H, Shafaghat L, Abbassalipour P, Hassanzadeh S, Alaeddini F, Farhadi M, Daneshi A.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Apr; 125(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 15823805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Auditory cortical maturation in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Sparreboom M, Beynon AJ, Snik AF, Mylanus EA.
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jan; 35(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 24335930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis.
    Shipp DB, Nedzelski JM.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():194-6. PubMed ID: 7668633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [Considerations on the rehabilitation of the hearing in cochlear implant patients].
    Amadori M, Pantano N, Cestaro A, Babighian G.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1996 Aug; 16(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9082826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Correlation between rCBF and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Fujiki N, Naito Y, Hirano S, Kojima H, Shiomi Y, Nishizawa S, Konishi J, Honjo I.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1999 Jul; 26(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 10419029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Prognostic value of round-window psychophysical testing with cochlear-implant candidates.
    Shipp DB, Nedzelski JM.
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Jun; 23(3):172-6. PubMed ID: 8064955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Bilateral input protects the cortex from unilaterally-driven reorganization in children who are deaf.
    Gordon KA, Wong DD, Papsin BC.
    Brain; 2013 May; 136(Pt 5):1609-25. PubMed ID: 23576127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The contribution of apical stimulation to Mandarin speech perception in users of the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Qi B, Liu B, Krenmayr A, Liu S, Gong S, Liu H, Zhang N, Han D.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jan; 131(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 20863152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Evidence for association between perception of electrical stimuli and rehabilitation dynamics in users of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant.
    Tavartkiladze GA, Frolenkov GI, Mironova EV.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():181-4. PubMed ID: 7668627
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Hearing history influences voice gender perceptual performance in cochlear implant users.
    Kovačić D, Balaban E.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):806-14. PubMed ID: 20683189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Multivariate study of auditory perception using multi-electrode cochlear implants].
    Picard M, Ferron P, Rochette C, Meyer F, Bergeron F, Blaney D, Desgagné M.
    J Otolaryngol; 1992 Apr; 21(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 1583705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J, Baker S, Caraway T, Kasulis H, Mears A, Smith J, Swim L, Wood M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Neurophysiological evidence of impaired musical sound perception in cochlear-implant users.
    Sandmann P, Kegel A, Eichele T, Dillier N, Lai W, Bendixen A, Debener S, Jancke L, Meyer M.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 121(12):2070-82. PubMed ID: 20570555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. McGurk effects in cochlear-implanted deaf subjects.
    Rouger J, Fraysse B, Deguine O, Barone P.
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan 10; 1188():87-99. PubMed ID: 18062941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Speech perception abilities of adults using a multichannel cochlear implant and frequency transposition hearing aid.
    Chute PM, Gravel JS, Popp AL.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep 10; 166():260-3. PubMed ID: 7668661
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.