These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
288 related items for PubMed ID: 15953530
21. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users. Kelly AS, Purdy SC, Thorne PR. Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Changes in the hearing and discomfort thresholds in patients with the Clark/nucleus inner ear prosthesis]. Battmer RD, Lehnhardt E, Laszig R. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1988 Aug; 67(8):412-5. PubMed ID: 3210875 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant. Boyd PJ. Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants. Vischer M, Haenggeli A, Zhang J, Pelizzone M, Häusler R, Rouiller EM. Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The effects of interpulse interval on stochastic properties of electrical stimulation: models and measurements. Matsuoka AJ, Rubinstein JT, Abbas PJ, Miller CA. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Apr; 48(4):416-24. PubMed ID: 11322529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels. Bierer JA, Nye AD. Ear Hear; 2014 Apr; 35(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 25036146 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users. Green T, Faulkner A, Rosen S. Ear Hear; 2012 Apr; 33(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 22367093 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of changing pulse rate on profile parameters of perceptual thresholds and loudness comfort levels and relation to ECAP thresholds in recipients of the Nucleus CI24RE device. Wesarg T, Battmer RD, Garrido LC, Dillier N, Garcia-Ibáñez L, Hey M, Macias AR, Irujo AH, Morsnowski A, Offeciers EF, Zarowski A, Pesch J, Rypkema G, Smoorenburg GF. Int J Audiol; 2010 Oct; 49(10):775-87. PubMed ID: 20666693 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current. Cohen LT. Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Psychophysical measures from electrical stimulation of the human cochlear nucleus. Shannon RV, Otto SR. Hear Res; 1990 Aug 01; 47(1-2):159-68. PubMed ID: 2228792 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Observer weighting of level and timing cues in bilateral cochlear implant users. van Hoesel RJ. J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec 01; 124(6):3861-72. PubMed ID: 19206812 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals. Vollmer M, Beitel RE, Snyder RL. J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov 01; 86(5):2330-43. PubMed ID: 11698523 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A reaction-time analysis of electrocochlear stimulation in cats. Walloch RA, Fenwick JA, Boberg R. Laryngoscope; 1980 May 01; 90(5 Pt 1):861-6. PubMed ID: 6892831 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Analysis of monophasic and biphasic electrical stimulation of nerve. Rubinstein JT, Miller CA, Mino H, Abbas PJ. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Oct 01; 48(10):1065-70. PubMed ID: 11585029 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Tone decay at threshold with auditory electrical stimulation in digisonic cochlear implantees. Wable J, Frachet B, Gallégo S. Audiology; 2001 Oct 01; 40(5):265-71. PubMed ID: 11688545 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Measuring the refractoriness of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. Morsnowski A, Charasse B, Collet L, Killian M, Müller-Deile J. Audiol Neurootol; 2006 Oct 01; 11(6):389-402. PubMed ID: 17008774 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Loudness growth observed under partially tripolar stimulation: model and data from cochlear implant listeners. Litvak LM, Spahr AJ, Emadi G. J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug 01; 122(2):967-81. PubMed ID: 17672645 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids. Davidson LS. Ear Hear; 2006 Oct 01; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users. Galvin JJ, Oba S, Başkent D, Fu QJ. Hear Res; 2015 Jun 01; 324():7-18. PubMed ID: 25746914 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Loudness Perception and Dynamic Range Depending on Interphase Gaps of Biphasic Pulses in Cochlear Implants. Pieper SH, Brill S, Bahmer A. Ear Hear; 2020 Jun 01; 41(5):1251-1257. PubMed ID: 31972773 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]