These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

217 related items for PubMed ID: 15955422

  • 1. Human auditory event-related potentials predict duration judgments.
    Bendixen A, Grimm S, Schröger E.
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug 05; 383(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 15955422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Auditory-evoked potentials to frequency increase and decrease of high- and low-frequency tones.
    Pratt H, Starr A, Michalewski HJ, Dimitrijevic A, Bleich N, Mittelman N.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb 05; 120(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 19070543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Optical imaging of temporal integration in human auditory cortex.
    Sable JJ, Low KA, Whalen CJ, Maclin EL, Fabiani M, Gratton G.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jan 05; 25(1):298-306. PubMed ID: 17241291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Brain dynamics in the auditory oddball task as a function of stimulus intensity and task requirements.
    Barry RJ, Rushby JA, Smith JL, Clarke AR, Croft RJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep 05; 73(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 19460406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Mismatch negativity (MMN) evoked by sound duration contrasts: an unexpected major effect of deviance direction on amplitudes.
    Colin C, Hoonhorst I, Markessis E, Radeau M, de Tourtchaninoff M, Foucher A, Collet G, Deltenre P.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jan 05; 120(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 19028137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Memory-based mismatch response to changes in duration of auditory stimuli: an MEG study.
    Hsu WY, Cheng CH, Lin HC, Liao KK, Wu ZA, Ho LT, Lin YY.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Oct 05; 121(10):1744-50. PubMed ID: 20471314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Occasional changes in sound location enhance middle latency evoked responses.
    Sonnadara RR, Alain C, Trainor LJ.
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar 03; 1076(1):187-92. PubMed ID: 16487494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA, Lister JJ, Frisch SA.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug 03; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Spatial location is accurately tracked by human auditory sensory memory: evidence from the mismatch negativity.
    Deouell LY, Parnes A, Pickard N, Knight RT.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Sep 03; 24(5):1488-94. PubMed ID: 16987229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The interaction between somatosensory and auditory cognitive processing assessed with event-related potentials.
    Touge T, Gonzalez D, Wu J, Deguchi K, Tsukaguchi M, Shimamura M, Ikeda K, Kuriyama S.
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr 03; 25(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 18340272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Processing of novel identifiability and duration in children and adults.
    Wetzel N, Widmann A, Schröger E.
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Jan 03; 86(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20959134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effects of interstimulus interval on sensory gating and on preattentive auditory memory in the oddball paradigm. Can magnitude of the sensory gating affect preattentive auditory comparison process?
    Ermutlu MN, Demiralp T, Karamürsel S.
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Jan 22; 412(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17197084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance.
    Jacobsen T, Schröger E, Winkler I, Horváth J.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov 22; 17(11):1704-13. PubMed ID: 16269107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. What is common to brain activity evoked by the perception of visual and auditory filled durations? A study with MEG and EEG co-recordings.
    N'Diaye K, Ragot R, Garnero L, Pouthas V.
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Oct 22; 21(2):250-68. PubMed ID: 15464356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The neurophysiological basis of the auditory continuity illusion: a mismatch negativity study.
    Micheyl C, Carlyon RP, Shtyrov Y, Hauk O, Dodson T, Pullvermüller F.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul 01; 15(5):747-58. PubMed ID: 12965047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP).
    Pakarinen S, Takegata R, Rinne T, Huotilainen M, Näätänen R.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan 01; 118(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 17070103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of spatial separation and stimulus probability on the event-related potentials elicited by occasional changes in sound location.
    Sonnadara RR, Alain C, Trainor LJ.
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb 03; 1071(1):175-85. PubMed ID: 16406012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An investigation of prototypical and atypical within-category vowels and non-speech analogues on cortical auditory evoked related potentials (AERPs) in 9 year old children.
    Bruder J, Leppänen PH, Bartling J, Csépe V, Démonet JF, Schulte-Körne G.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb 03; 79(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 20888869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction?
    Horváth J, Winkler I, Bendixen A.
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct 03; 79(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 18468765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Theta oscillation during auditory change detection: An MEG study.
    Hsiao FJ, Wu ZA, Ho LT, Lin YY.
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Apr 03; 81(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 19428969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.