These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


127 related items for PubMed ID: 15959984

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. An evaluation of the haemostatic suture in hysterotomy closure in the mare.
    Freeman DE, Johnston JK, Baker GJ, Hungerford LL, Lock TF.
    Equine Vet J; 1999 May; 31(3):208-11. PubMed ID: 10402133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. SURGICAL REPAIR OF THIRD-DEGREE PERINEAL LACERATION AND RECTOVAGINAL FISTULA IN THE MARE.
    AANES WA.
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1964 Mar 01; 144():485-91. PubMed ID: 14126857
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Early secondary repair of third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations after outpatient wound preparation.
    Arona AJ, al-Marayati L, Grimes DA, Ballard CA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug 01; 86(2):294-6. PubMed ID: 7617365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. A comparison of "hands off" versus "hands on" techniques for decreasing perineal lacerations during birth.
    de Souza Caroci da Costa A, Gonzalez Riesco ML.
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2006 Aug 01; 51(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 16504907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. "The sponge perineum:" an innovative method of teaching fourth-degree obstetric perineal laceration repair to family medicine residents.
    Sparks RA, Beesley AD, Jones AD.
    Fam Med; 2006 Sep 01; 38(8):542-4. PubMed ID: 16944382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Leroux N, Bujold E.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun 01; 194(6):1585-90; discussion 1590. PubMed ID: 16731075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Effectiveness of local anaesthetics with and without vasoconstrictors for perineal repair during spontaneous delivery: double-blind randomised controlled trial.
    Colacioppo PM, Gonzalez Riesco ML.
    Midwifery; 2009 Feb 01; 25(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 17604885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Survival rates of mares and foals and postoperative complications and fertility of mares after cesarean section: 95 cases (1986-2000).
    Abernathy-Young KK, LeBlanc MM, Embertson RM, Pierce SW, Stromberg AJ.
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2012 Oct 01; 241(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 23013507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
    Caughey AB, Sandberg PL, Zlatnik MG, Thiet MP, Parer JT, Laros RK.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov 01; 106(5 Pt 1):908-12. PubMed ID: 16260505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.