These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

162 related items for PubMed ID: 1597174

  • 1. Influence of body segment dynamics on loads at the lumbar spine during lifting.
    Tsuang YH, Schipplein OD, Trafimow JH, Andersson GB.
    Ergonomics; 1992 Apr; 35(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 1597174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of dynamic factors and external loads on the moment at the lumbar spine in lifting.
    Buseck M, Schipplein OD, Andersson GB, Andriacchi TP.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1988 Aug; 13(8):918-21. PubMed ID: 3187716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Relationship between moments at the L5/S1 level, hip and knee joint when lifting.
    Schipplein OD, Trafimow JH, Andersson GB, Andriacchi TP.
    J Biomech; 1990 Aug; 23(9):907-12. PubMed ID: 2211735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biomechanical analysis and assessment of lumbar stress during load lifting using a dynamic 19-segment human model.
    Jäger M, Luttmann A.
    Ergonomics; 1989 Jan; 32(1):93-112. PubMed ID: 2924764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The influence of load knowledge on lifting technique.
    Butler D, Andersson GB, Trafimow J, Schipplein OD, Andriacchi TP.
    Ergonomics; 1993 Dec; 36(12):1489-93. PubMed ID: 8287855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effect of on-body lift assistive device on the lumbar 3D dynamic moments and EMG during asymmetric freestyle lifting.
    Abdoli-E M, Stevenson JM.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Mar; 23(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 18093709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Dynamic versus static analyses of lifting a box from the floor.
    Menzer HM, Reiser RF.
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2005 Mar; 41():305-10. PubMed ID: 15850123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling.
    Jäger M, Luttmann A.
    Ergonomics; 1992 Mar; 35(7-8):783-805. PubMed ID: 1633789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
    Kingma I, Bosch T, Bruins L, van Dieën JH.
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct 22; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Lumbar spine loads during the lifting of extremely heavy weights.
    Cholewicki J, McGill SM, Norman RW.
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1991 Oct 22; 23(10):1179-86. PubMed ID: 1758295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of changes in lordosis on mechanics of the lumbar spine-lumbar curvature in lifting.
    Shirazi-Adl A, Parnianpour M.
    J Spinal Disord; 1999 Oct 22; 12(5):436-47. PubMed ID: 10549710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The evaluation of a practical biomechanical model estimating lumbar moments in occupational activities.
    de Looze MP, Kingma I, Thunnissen W, van Wijk MJ, Toussaint HM.
    Ergonomics; 1994 Sep 22; 37(9):1495-502. PubMed ID: 7957027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Hip load moments and muscular activity during lifting.
    Németh G, Ekholm J, Arborelius UP.
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1984 Sep 22; 16(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 6494834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.