These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1120 related items for PubMed ID: 15978485

  • 1. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS, Purdy SC, Thorne PR.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Relationship between auditory perception skills and mismatch negativity recorded in free field in cochlear-implant users.
    Roman S, Canévet G, Marquis P, Triglia JM, Liégeois-Chauvel C.
    Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):10-20. PubMed ID: 15721556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Auditory late cortical response and speech recognition in Digisonic cochlear implant users.
    Maurer J, Collet L, Pelster H, Truy E, Gallégo S.
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Dec; 112(12):2220-4. PubMed ID: 12461344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants.
    Sasaki T, Yamamoto K, Iwaki T, Kubo T.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM, Julyan PJ, Hastings DL, Ramsden RT.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Changes of the late acoustically evoked potentials in postlingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Schmidt R, Kaftan H, Hosemann W, Gräbel S.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Mar; 84(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 15770566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Neurophysiological evidence of impaired musical sound perception in cochlear-implant users.
    Sandmann P, Kegel A, Eichele T, Dillier N, Lai W, Bendixen A, Debener S, Jancke L, Meyer M.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 121(12):2070-82. PubMed ID: 20570555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH, Zhang F, Kadis DS, Houston LM, Samy RN, Smith ML, Dimitrijevic A.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Use of the event-related P300 potential in cochlear implant subjects for the study of strategy-dependent speech processing.
    Beynon AJ, Snik AF.
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S44-7. PubMed ID: 15732382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM, Wohlberedt T, Hoppe U.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Automatic and attentive processing of sounds in cochlear implant patients - electrophysiological evidence.
    Nager W, Münte TF, Bohrer I, Lenarz T, Dengler R, Möbes J, Schröder C, Lesinski-Schiedat A.
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 25(3-4):391-6. PubMed ID: 17943014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 56.