These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1225 related items for PubMed ID: 15980235
1. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma. Leeprechanon N, Giangiacomo A, Fontana H, Hoffman D, Caprioli J. Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2. Huang CQ, Carolan J, Redline D, Taravati P, Woodward KR, Johnson CA, Wall M, Keltner JL. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry. Wall M, Woodward KR, Doyle CK, Artes PH. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood DC, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Chauhan BC, Johnson CA. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma. Clement CI, Goldberg I, Healey PR, Graham S. Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients. Bozkurt B, Yilmaz PT, Irkec M. J Glaucoma; 2008 May; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Spry PG, Johnson CA, McKendrick AM, Turpin A. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 May; 42(6):1404-10. PubMed ID: 11328758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis. Sakai T, Matsushima M, Shikishima K, Kitahara K. Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 17382395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma. Leeprechanon N, Giaconi JA, Manassakorn A, Hoffman D, Caprioli J. Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry. Wild JM, Kim LS, Pacey IE, Cunliffe IA. Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma. Liu S, Lam S, Weinreb RN, Ye C, Cheung CY, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep 21; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses. Artes PH, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec 21; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing. Wall M, Punke SG, Stickney TL, Brito CF, Withrow KR, Kardon RH. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb 21; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual field progression with frequency-doubling matrix perimetry and standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in healthy controls. Redmond T, O'Leary N, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, Artes PH, Chauhan BC. JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec 21; 131(12):1565-72. PubMed ID: 24177807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma. Boden C, Pascual J, Medeiros FA, Aihara M, Weinreb RN, Sample PA. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul 21; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity and specificity of the Humphrey Matrix to detect homonymous hemianopias. Taravati P, Woodward KR, Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Redline D, Carolan J, Huang CQ, Wall M. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar 21; 49(3):924-8. PubMed ID: 18326713 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]