These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

161 related items for PubMed ID: 15984967

  • 21. Comparison of esophageal acid exposure at 1 cm and 6 cm above the squamocolumnar junction using the Bravo pH monitoring system.
    Pandolfino JE, Lee TJ, Schreiner MA, Zhang Q, Roth MP, Kahrilas PJ.
    Dis Esophagus; 2006; 19(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 16722995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Review article: oesophageal pH monitoring--technologies, interpretation and correlation with clinical outcomes.
    Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE.
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2005 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():2-9. PubMed ID: 16303031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Ambulatory 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring: the importance of manometry.
    Johnson PE, Koufman JA, Nowak LJ, Belafsky PC, Postma GN.
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Nov; 111(11 Pt 1):1970-5. PubMed ID: 11801980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Comparison of wireless 48-h (Bravo) versus traditional ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring.
    Håkanson BS, Berggren P, Granqvist S, Ljungqvist O, Thorell A.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2009 Nov; 44(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 19040176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [Efficacy, diagnostic utility and tolerance of intraesophageal pH ambulatory determination with wireless pH-testing monitoring system].
    Carmona-Sánchez R, Solana-Sentíes S.
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2004 Nov; 69(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 15757154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. BRAVO wireless 48 hour pH-metric system.
    Hess T, Hahn EG, Konturek PC.
    Med Sci Monit; 2009 Jan; 15(1):RA17-21. PubMed ID: 19114981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Nonendoscopic transnasal placement of a wireless capsule for esophageal pH monitoring: feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a manometry-guided procedure.
    Marchese M, Spada C, Iacopini F, Familiari P, Shah SG, Tringali A, Costamagna G.
    Endoscopy; 2006 Aug; 38(8):813-8. PubMed ID: 17001571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Evaluation of a new catheter for esophageal pH monitoring.
    Kuit JA, Schepel SJ, Bijleveld CM, Kleibeuker JH.
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1991 Feb; 38(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 2026394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Ambulatory pH: monitoring with a wireless system.
    Schneider JH, Kramer KM, Königsrainer A, Granderath FA.
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Nov; 21(11):2076-80. PubMed ID: 17484003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comparison of data obtained from sedated versus unsedated wireless telemetry capsule placement: does sedation affect the results of ambulatory 48-hour pH testing?
    Belafsky PC, Godin DA, Garcia JC, Rahim N.
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jun; 115(6):1109-13. PubMed ID: 15933532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.