These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
335 related items for PubMed ID: 15988862
1. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization. Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights. Reilly EA. Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996 Jun; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions? Ezzard MM. Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990 Jun; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The constitutional implications of human cloning. Foley EP. Ariz Law Rev; 2000 Jun; 42(3):647-730. PubMed ID: 15747441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court. Bertz RC. West State Univ Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Privacy and the regulation of the new reproductive technologies: a decision-making approach. Sedillo Lopez A. Fam Law Q; 1988 Jun; 22(2):173-97. PubMed ID: 16100818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment. Shapiro AA. Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions. Weissmann R. Annu Surv Am Law; 1999 Oct; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]