These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

344 related items for PubMed ID: 15999439

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Splitting the baby: when can a pregnant minor obtain an abortion without parental consent? The Ex parte Anonymous cases (Alabama 2001).
    Rosenberg SP.
    Conn Law Rev; 2002; 34(3):1109-41. PubMed ID: 15212029
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy.
    Long SL, Ravenscraft P.
    Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Substantive due process after Gonzales v. Carhart.
    Calabresi SG.
    Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1517-42. PubMed ID: 18595213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Lesbians and abortion.
    Robson R.
    Rev Law Soc Change; 2011 Jun; 35(1):247-79. PubMed ID: 21774157
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Donohue lecture series: "Roe v. Wade: past and future".
    Weddington S.
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1990 Jun; 24(3):601-20. PubMed ID: 16047442
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Constitutional law--Supreme Court is undecided on parental notification requirement for minor's abortion.
    McArthur JR.
    S C Law Rev; 1980 Feb; 31(3):604-16. PubMed ID: 11665169
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ.
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000 Feb; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E.
    Free Inq; 2006 Feb; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Abortion wars, once again. The case being argued this week before the Supreme Court may determine just how far state restrictions can go.
    Halloran L.
    US News World Rep; 2005 Dec 05; 139(21):29-30. PubMed ID: 16389673
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Physician assistant as abortion provider: lessons from Vermont, New York, and Montana.
    Schirmer JT.
    Hastings Law J; 1997 Nov 05; 49(1):253-88. PubMed ID: 14758819
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Freedom at home: state constitutions and Medicaid funding for abortions.
    Vanzi LM.
    N M Law Rev; 1996 Nov 05; 26(3):433-54. PubMed ID: 16100794
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Lochner redeemed: family privacy after Troxel and Carhart.
    Meyer DD.
    UCLA Law Rev; 2001 Jun 05; 48(5):1125-90. PubMed ID: 16273684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The next abortion decision.
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov 30; ():A34. PubMed ID: 16450474
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.