These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
145 related items for PubMed ID: 16000688
1. In one's own image: ethics and the reproduction of deafness. Johnston T. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(4):426-41. PubMed ID: 16000688 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic selection for deafness: the views of hearing children of deaf adults. Mand C, Duncan RE, Gillam L, Collins V, Delatycki MB. J Med Ethics; 2009 Dec; 35(12):722-8. PubMed ID: 19948926 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The implications of genetic testing for deafness. Arnos KS. Ear Hear; 2003 Aug; 24(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 12923423 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethnicity, ethics, and the deaf-world. Lane H. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005 Aug; 10(3):291-310. PubMed ID: 15872148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Reproductive autonomy: a case study on deafness]. Diniz D. Cad Saude Publica; 2003 Aug; 19(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 12700796 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Designing deaf babies and the question of disability. Bauman HD. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005 Aug; 10(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 15858071 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical and cultural considerations in research on hereditary deafness. Grundfast KM, Rosen J. Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1992 Oct; 25(5):973-8. PubMed ID: 1408199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic advances require comprehensive bioethical debate. ten Have HA. Croat Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):533-7. PubMed ID: 14515408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Is it ever morally permissible to select for deafness in one's child? Wallis JM. Med Health Care Philos; 2020 Mar; 23(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 31542873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Deafness, culture, and choice. Levy N. J Med Ethics; 2002 Oct; 28(5):284-5. PubMed ID: 12356951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethics, deafness, and new medical technologies. Hintermair M, Albertini JA. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005 Oct; 10(2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15778214 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Parental perspective of the benefits of genetic testing in children with congenital deafness. Geelhoed EA, Harrison K, Davey A, Walpole IR. Public Health Genomics; 2009 Oct; 12(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 19367092 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Attitudes towards prenatal diagnosis of deafness among parents to children with cochlear implants]. Thorsen A, Devantier L, Ovesen T. Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Apr 20; 171(17):1387-91. PubMed ID: 19413935 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetics: deaf by design. Dennis C. Nature; 2004 Oct 21; 431(7011):894-6. PubMed ID: 15496889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. There is a difference between selecting a deaf embryo and deafening a hearing child. Häyry M. J Med Ethics; 2004 Oct 21; 30(5):510-2. PubMed ID: 15467091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Deaf by design: disability and impartiality. Shaw D. Bioethics; 2008 Sep 21; 22(8):407-13. PubMed ID: 18477056 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Attitudes towards genetic diagnosis in Pakistan: a survey of medical and legal communities and parents of thalassemic children. Gilani AI, Jadoon AS, Qaiser R, Nasim S, Meraj R, Nasir N, Naqvi FF, Latif Z, Memon MA, Menezes EV, Malik I, Memon MZ, Kazim SF, Ahmad U. Community Genet; 2007 Sep 21; 10(3):140-6. PubMed ID: 17575458 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Identity, harm, and the ethics of reproductive technology. Malek J. J Med Philos; 2006 Feb 21; 31(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 16464771 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Choosing deafness with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an ethical way to carry on a cultural bloodline? Camporesi S. Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2010 Feb 21; 19(1):86-96. PubMed ID: 20025805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]