These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

697 related items for PubMed ID: 16001475

  • 1. Chapter 765 revisited: Florida's new advance directives law.
    Calder M.
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 20(2):291-365. PubMed ID: 16001475
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An Oklahoma perspective: end of life decision-making and termination of treatment.
    Burkett TM, Weyrauch S.
    Tulsa Law J; 2000; 35(3-4):565-81. PubMed ID: 16273679
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Exercising the right to die: a proposal for New York.
    Caffera SM.
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1991; 42(4):1189-240. PubMed ID: 16130264
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A time to live, a time to die.
    Stiefel LS.
    Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):699-741. PubMed ID: 16144097
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Right to refuse life sustaining medical treatment and the noncompetent nonterminally ill patient: an analysis of abridgment and anarchy.
    Adamson EH.
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1990; 17(2):461-92. PubMed ID: 16047420
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Legal issues in end-of-life care in Oklahoma.
    Cross LL.
    Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 2002; 27(3):921-37. PubMed ID: 15478256
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome.
    Brindisi TJ.
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1994; 23(2):619-44. PubMed ID: 16086514
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence.
    Roach CA.
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
    Strasser M.
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1996 Jun; (208):9-75. PubMed ID: 10158433
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A survey of living will and advanced health care directives.
    Horttor BJ.
    N D Law Rev; 1998 Jun; 74(2):233-93. PubMed ID: 16437813
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The health care agent: protecting the choices and interests of patients who lack capacity.
    Swidler RN.
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1988 Jun; 6(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 16998980
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Deciding for others: New York law and the rights of incompetent persons to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment.
    Martino M.
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1996 Jun; 41(1):285-308. PubMed ID: 12718312
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Redrafting Ohio's advance directive laws.
    Martyn SR, Reagan JE, Minogue B, Dippel DL, Schimer MR, Taraszewski R.
    Akron Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 26(2):229-92. PubMed ID: 16506326
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Keilitz I, Bilzor JC, Hafemeister TL, Brown V, Dudyshyn D.
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989 Jun; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Advance directives: an overview of changing right-to-die laws.
    Fade AE.
    J Nurs Law; 1995 Jun; 2(3):27-38. PubMed ID: 12545976
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients.
    Dippel DL.
    Akron Law Rev; 1991 Jun; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Deja vu all over again: the false dichotomy between sanctity of life and quality of life.
    Cantor NL.
    Stetson Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 35(1):81-100. PubMed ID: 17099994
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The Constitution at the threshold of life and death: a suggested approach to accommodate an interest in life and a right to die.
    Allen MP.
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2004 Jun; 53(5):971-1020. PubMed ID: 15529470
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The right to die in Montana: the Montana Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act.
    Hunt WE.
    Mont Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 54(2):339-56. PubMed ID: 16180290
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
    New Jersey.
    N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul 11; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.