These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

555 related items for PubMed ID: 16003955

  • 21. Effects of powdered activated carbon dosing on sludge characteristics and estrogen removal in membrane bioreactors.
    Yang W, Paetkau M, Cicek N.
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2193-8. PubMed ID: 20418614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Seasonal variation in membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater.
    Miyoshi T, Tsuyuhara T, Ogyu R, Kimura K, Watanabe Y.
    Water Res; 2009 Dec; 43(20):5109-18. PubMed ID: 19767055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Correlation of EPS content in activated sludge at different sludge retention times with membrane fouling phenomena.
    Al-Halbouni D, Traber J, Lyko S, Wintgens T, Melin T, Tacke D, Janot A, Dott W, Hollender J.
    Water Res; 2008 Mar; 42(6-7):1475-88. PubMed ID: 18023465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Fouling control in submerged membrane bioreactors.
    Judd S.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Mar; 51(6-7):27-34. PubMed ID: 16003958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Membrane bioreactors for water reclamation.
    Tao G, Kekre K, Wei Z, Lee TC, Viswanath B, Seah H.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Mar; 51(6-7):431-40. PubMed ID: 16004005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Organic colloids and their influence on low-pressure membrane filtration.
    Laabs C, Amy G, Jekel M.
    Water Sci Technol; 2004 Mar; 50(12):311-6. PubMed ID: 15686036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The optimum operational condition of membrane bioreactor (MBR): cost estimation of aeration and sludge treatment.
    Yoon SH, Kim HS, Yeom IT.
    Water Res; 2004 Jan; 38(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 14630101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Performance of ultrafiltration membrane process combined with coagulation/sedimentation.
    Jang NY, Watanabe Y, Minegishi S.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Jan; 51(6-7):209-19. PubMed ID: 16003980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Effect of PAC addition on sludge properties in an MBR treating high strength wastewater.
    Satyawali Y, Balakrishnan M.
    Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(6):1577-88. PubMed ID: 19201006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Cost effective and advanced phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors for a decentralised wastewater technology.
    Gnirss R, Lesjean B, Adam C, Buisson H.
    Water Sci Technol; 2003 Apr; 47(12):133-9. PubMed ID: 12926680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Optimising the operation of a MBR pilot plant by quantitative analysis of the membrane fouling mechanism.
    Jiang T, Kennedy MD, Guinzbourg BF, Vanrolleghem PA, Schippers JC.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Apr; 51(6-7):19-25. PubMed ID: 16003957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Influence of operational conditions on the performance of a mesh filter activated sludge process.
    Fuchs W, Resch C, Kernstock M, Mayer M, Schoeberl P, Braun R.
    Water Res; 2005 Mar; 39(5):803-10. PubMed ID: 15743625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Effects of flux enhancing polymer on the characteristics of sludge in membrane bioreactor process.
    Yoon SH, Collins JH, Musale D, Sundararajan S, Tsai SP, Hallsby GA, Kong JF, Koppes J, Cachia P.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Mar; 51(6-7):151-7. PubMed ID: 16003973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Performance comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic aerobic sidestream membrane bioreactors treating high strength wastewater.
    Abeynayaka A, Visvanathan C.
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 May; 102(9):5345-52. PubMed ID: 21145734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Influence of mixed liquor properties and aeration intensity on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor at high mixed liquor suspended solids concentrations.
    Trussell RS, Merlo RP, Hermanowicz SW, Jenkins D.
    Water Res; 2007 Mar; 41(5):947-58. PubMed ID: 17239918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Complexity of ultrafiltration membrane fouling caused by macromolecular dissolved organic compounds in secondary effluents.
    Haberkamp J, Ernst M, Böckelmann U, Szewzyk U, Jekel M.
    Water Res; 2008 Jun; 42(12):3153-61. PubMed ID: 18423516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material.
    Meng F, Chae SR, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin HS, Yang F.
    Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(6):1489-512. PubMed ID: 19178926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Performance analysis of a combined system of membrane bioreactor and worm reactor: wastewater treatment, sludge reduction and membrane fouling.
    Tian Y, Lu Y, Li Z.
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Oct; 121():176-82. PubMed ID: 22858483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Accumulation of biopolymer clusters in a submerged membrane bioreactor and its effect on membrane fouling.
    Wang XM, Li XY.
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(4-5):855-62. PubMed ID: 17889249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
    Myung SW, Choi IH, Lee SH, Kim IC, Lee KH.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Feb; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.