These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


159 related items for PubMed ID: 16006573

  • 1. Influence of age on cervical cancer survival in Japan.
    Ioka A, Tsukuma H, Ajiki W, Oshima A.
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 Aug; 35(8):464-9. PubMed ID: 16006573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Survival of male breast cancer patients: a population-based study in Osaka, Japan.
    Ioka A, Tsukuma H, Ajiki W, Oshima A.
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2006 Nov; 36(11):699-703. PubMed ID: 17012302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer screening and impact on cervical cancer mortality in Austria.
    Vutuc C, Haidinger G, Waldhoer T, Ahmad F, Breitenecker G.
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 May 07; 111(9):354-9. PubMed ID: 10407996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B, Kemetli L, Sparén P, Silfverdal L, Strander B, Ryd W, Dillner J, Törnberg S.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May 07; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
    van der Aa MA, Schutter EM, Looijen-Salamon M, Martens JE, Siesling S.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug 07; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Screen-detected invasive cervical carcinoma and its clinical significance during the introduction of organized screening.
    Herbert A, Anshu, Gregory M, Gupta SS, Singh N.
    BJOG; 2009 May 07; 116(6):854-9. PubMed ID: 19371308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
    Skjeldestad FE, Hagen B, Hagmar B, Iversen OE, Juvkam KH, Steen R, Thoresen S, Hareide B.
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun 28; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Descriptive epidemiology of vaginal cancer incidence and survival by race, ethnicity, and age in the United States.
    Wu X, Matanoski G, Chen VW, Saraiya M, Coughlin SS, King JB, Tao XG.
    Cancer; 2008 Nov 15; 113(10 Suppl):2873-82. PubMed ID: 18980291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Determinants of inequalities in cervical cancer stage at diagnosis and survival in New Zealand.
    Priest P, Sadler L, Sykes P, Marshall R, Peters J, Crengle S.
    Cancer Causes Control; 2010 Feb 15; 21(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 19847659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.
    Schindeler S, Morrell S, Zuo Y, Baker D.
    J Med Screen; 2008 Feb 15; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Ethnic differences in survival among Pacific Island patients diagnosed with cervical cancer.
    Robison SW, Dietrich CS, Person DA, Farley JH.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Feb 15; 84(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 11812091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Indications for primary and secondary exenterations in patients with cervical cancer.
    Marnitz S, Köhler C, Müller M, Behrens K, Hasenbein K, Schneider A.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec 15; 103(3):1023-30. PubMed ID: 16890276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cervical cancer incidence in the United States by area of residence, 1998 2001.
    Benard VB, Coughlin SS, Thompson T, Richardson LC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep 15; 110(3):681-6. PubMed ID: 17766618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Socioeconomic status and cervical cancer survival among older women: findings from the SEER-Medicare linked data cohorts.
    Coker AL, Du XL, Fang S, Eggleston KS.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug 15; 102(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 16434087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.