These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1126 related items for PubMed ID: 16011057
1. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial experience in Israel with 110 cases. Nadu A, Mor Y, Chen J, Sofer M, Golomb J, Ramon J. Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Jul; 7(7):431-4. PubMed ID: 16011057 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The laparoscopic approach to renal tumors outcome of 121 laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy procedures]. Nadu A, Laufer M, Winkler H, Kleinmann N, Ramon J. Harefuah; 2005 Sep; 144(9):609-12, 679. PubMed ID: 16218528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: techniques, results and oncological outcome in 125 consecutive cases. Wille AH, Roigas J, Deger S, Tüllmann M, Türk I, Loening SA. Eur Urol; 2004 Apr; 45(4):483-8; discussion 488-9. PubMed ID: 15041113 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial experience with 120 cases. Cheema IA, Manecksha RP, Murphy M, Flynn R. Ir Med J; 2010 Feb; 103(2):49-51. PubMed ID: 20666056 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients. Chen Y, Xu H, Li Y, Wang D, Li J, Yuan J, Liang Z. Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Financial analysis of open versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy. Meraney AM, Gill IS. J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1757-62. PubMed ID: 11912404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients. Marszalek M, Meixl H, Polajnar M, Rauchenwald M, Jeschke K, Madersbacher S. Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19232819 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical experience and outcomes. Pyo P, Chen A, Grasso M. J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1279-83. PubMed ID: 18707736 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy: the Mayo clinic experience. Simon SD, Castle EP, Ferrigni RG, Lamm DL, Swanson SK, Novicki DE, Andrews PE. J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1447-50. PubMed ID: 15017195 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: the learning-curve experience. Tse ET, Knaus RP. Can J Surg; 1994 Apr; 37(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 8156470 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: technique and results. Lattouf JB, Beri A, D'Ambros OF, Grüll M, Leeb K, Janetschek G. Eur Urol; 2008 Aug; 54(2):409-16. PubMed ID: 18440123 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct access to the renal artery at the level of treitz ligament during left radical laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy. Porpiglia F, Terrone C, Cracco C, Renard J, Musso F, Grande S, Scarpa RM. Eur Urol; 2005 Aug; 48(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 15939529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The experience of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumors]. Murota T, Danno S, Oguchi N, Shimada O, Nakagawa M, Sugi M, Muguruma K, Koyama Y, Kawamura H, Ohara T, Kawakita M, Matsuda T. Hinyokika Kiyo; 2002 Mar; 48(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 11993207 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, Dulabon LM, Patel MN, Lipkin M, Wang AJ, Stifelman MD. J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):866-72. PubMed ID: 19616229 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]