These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
374 related items for PubMed ID: 1601158
1. Preparation of human frozen-thawed seminal specimens using the SpermPrep filtration method: improvements over the conventional swim-up method. Zavos PM. Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1326-30. PubMed ID: 1601158 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Preparation of oligozoospermic and/or asthenozoospermic semen for intrauterine insemination using the SpermPrep semen filtration column. Ohashi K, Saji F, Wakimoto A, Kato M, Tsutsui T, Tanizawa O. Fertil Steril; 1992 Apr; 57(4):866-70. PubMed ID: 1313377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvements in qualitative characteristics of cryopreserved human spermatozoa following recovery via the SpermPrep II filtration method. Zavos PM, Sofikitis N, Toda T, Miyagawa I. Tohoku J Exp Med; 1991 Dec; 165(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 1818436 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Preparation and recovery of frozen-thawed bovine spermatozoa via various sperm selection techniques employed in assisted reproductive technologies. Correa JR, Zavos PM. Theriogenology; 1996 Nov 01; 46(7):1225-32. PubMed ID: 16727985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of postseparation sperm parameters to determine the method of choice for sperm preparation for assisted reproductive technology. Smith S, Hosid S, Scott L. Fertil Steril; 1995 Mar 01; 63(3):591-7. PubMed ID: 7851592 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative and qualitative characteristics of frozen-thawed bovine spermatozoa recovered via a conventional and a standardized swim-up technique. Correa JR, Zarmakoupis-Zavos PN, Zavos PM. Tohoku J Exp Med; 1997 Feb 01; 181(2):267-74. PubMed ID: 9163843 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of sperm quality, morphometry and function among human sperm populations recovered via SpermPrep II filtration, swim-up and Percoll density gradient methods. Yamamoto Y, Maenosono S, Okada H, Miyagawa I, Sofikitis N. Andrologia; 1997 Feb 01; 29(6):303-10. PubMed ID: 9430435 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Epididymal spermatozoa: recovery and subsequent improvements of mouse epididymal spermatozoa via the SpermPrep filtration method. Zavos PM, Correa JR, Zarmakoupis PN. Tohoku J Exp Med; 1995 Feb 01; 175(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 7541168 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The combination of two semen preparation techniques (glass wool filtration and swim-up) and their effect on the morphology of recovered spermatozoa and outcome of IVF-ET. al-Hasani S, Alpüstün S, Ludwig M, Diedrich K, Bauer O, Küpker W, Wolff A, Krebs D. Int J Androl; 1996 Feb 01; 19(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 8698539 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A method of short-term cryostorage and selection of viable sperm for use in the various assisted reproductive techniques. Zavos PM, Correa JR, Sofikitis N, Kofinas GD, Zarmakoupis PN. Tohoku J Exp Med; 1995 Jun 01; 176(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 7482525 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sperm preparation after freezing improves motile sperm count, motility, and viability in frozen-thawed sperm compared with sperm preparation before freezing-thawing process. Palomar Rios A, Gascón A, Martínez JV, Balasch S, Molina Botella I. J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Feb 01; 35(2):237-245. PubMed ID: 28990130 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination. Boomsma CM, Heineman MJ, Cohlen BJ, Farquhar C. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004 Feb 01; (3):CD004507. PubMed ID: 15266536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of Percoll discontinuous density gradients vs SpermPrep II vs Sephadex G-50 gel filtration on semen parameters. Check JH, Zavos PM, Katsoff D, Kiefer D. Tohoku J Exp Med; 1993 Mar 01; 169(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 7504330 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Motile sperm recovery from fresh and frozen-thawed ejaculates using a swim-up procedure. Graczykowski JW, Siegel MS. Fertil Steril; 1991 Apr 01; 55(4):841-3. PubMed ID: 2010014 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods of semen preparation for intrauterine insemination and subsequent pregnancy rates. Zavos PM, Centola GM. Tohoku J Exp Med; 1992 Dec 01; 168(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 1306606 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination. Boomsma CM, Heineman MJ, Cohlen BJ, Farquhar C. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Oct 17; (4):CD004507. PubMed ID: 17943816 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between the quality and function of sperm after semen processing with two different methods. Hammadeh ME, Zavos PM, Rosenbaum P, Schmidt W. Asian J Androl; 2001 Jun 17; 3(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11404797 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sperm selection by PD-10 sephadex columns: comparison with SpermPrep filtration and Percoll centrifugation. López O, Mata A, Antich M, Bassas L. Hum Reprod; 1993 May 17; 8(5):732-6. PubMed ID: 8314969 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of sperm preparation methods. Wash and concentration, swim-up, migration-gravity sedimentation, 80% Percoll and semen filtration column. Matsuoka I, Fujino Y, Ito F, Koh B, Kojima T, Ogita S. J Reprod Med; 1995 May 17; 40(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 7608872 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of sperm processing on the fertilizing capacity and recovery of motile sperm from thawed human semen. Graczykowski JW, Siegel MS. Arch Androl; 1991 May 17; 26(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 1872648 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]