These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
59 related items for PubMed ID: 1602271
1. Diminishing marginal value as delay discounting. Rachlin H. J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 May; 57(3):407-15. PubMed ID: 1602271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethanol- and sucrose-reinforced appetitive and consummatory responding in HAD1, HAD2, and P rats. Czachowski CL, Samson HH. Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2002 Nov; 26(11):1653-61. PubMed ID: 12436053 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Choice between delayed reinforcers in an adjusting-delay schedule: the effects of absolute reinforcer size and deprivation level. Wogar MA, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E. Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Jul; 45(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 1496135 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Consummatory suppression due to incentive downshift is not a consequence of enhanced search behavior. Lopez Seal MF, Cuenya L, Suarez AB, Mustaca AE. Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():69-71. PubMed ID: 23694741 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The molarity of molecular theory and the molecularity of molar theory. Bersh PJ. J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 May; 75(3):348-50; discussion 367-78. PubMed ID: 11453625 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-factor theory has strong empirical evidence of validity. Williams BA. J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 May; 75(3):362-5; discussion 367-78. PubMed ID: 11453629 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of partial reinforcement and time between reinforced trials on terminal response rate in pigeon autoshaping. Gottlieb DA. Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 16413974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of variable training, signaled and unsignaled delays, and d-amphetamine on delay-discounting functions. Slezak JM, Anderson KG. Behav Pharmacol; 2009 Sep; 20(5-6):424-36. PubMed ID: 19730365 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond the molar-molecular distinction: we need multiscaled analyses. Hineline PN. J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 May; 75(3):342-7; discussion 367-78. PubMed ID: 11453624 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. How pigeons estimate rates of prey encounter. Shettleworth SJ, Plowright CM. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jul; 18(3):219-35. PubMed ID: 1619391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of sibutramine on the appetitive and consummatory aspects of feeding in non-human primates. Foltin RW. Physiol Behav; 2006 Feb 28; 87(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 16352322 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on inter-temporal choice: further observations with an adjusting-delay procedure. da Costa Araújo S, Body S, Hampson CL, Langley RW, Deakin JF, Anderson IM, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E. Behav Brain Res; 2009 Sep 14; 202(2):272-7. PubMed ID: 19463712 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Sex differences in the effects of septal lesions. Kondo CY, Lorens SA. Physiol Behav; 1971 May 14; 6(5):481-5. PubMed ID: 5149436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]