These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

181 related items for PubMed ID: 16022812

  • 1. [Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts by computed tomography: comparison with conventional coronary angiography].
    Trigo Bautista A, Estornell J, Ridocci F, Soriano CJ, Gudín M, Vilar JV, Federico P, Payá R, Cervera V, Velasco JA.
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2005 Jul; 58(7):807-14. PubMed ID: 16022812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Assessment of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery by means of magnetic resonance imaging.
    Stauder NI, Fenchel M, Stauder H, Küttner A, Scheule AM, Kramer U, Claussen CD, Miller S.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 129(3):607-14. PubMed ID: 15746745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Is there an indication for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts?
    Dikkers R, van der Zaag-Loonen HJ, Willems TP, Post WJ, Oudkerk M.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009 Mar; 33(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 19478621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency: assessment with high-resolution submillimeter 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) versus coronary angiography.
    Anders K, Baum U, Schmid M, Ropers D, Schmid A, Pohle K, Daniel WG, Bautz W, Achenbach S.
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 16446072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of nitroglycerin on the diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiogram-gated coronary computed tomography angiography.
    Chun EJ, Lee W, Choi YH, Koo BK, Choi SI, Jae HJ, Kim HC, So YH, Chung JW, Park JH.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008 Mar; 32(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18303294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography.
    Laynez-Carnicero A, Estornell-Erill J, Trigo-Bautista A, Valle-Muñoz A, Nadal-Barangé M, Romaguera-Torres R, Planas del Viejo A, Corbí-Pascual M, Payá-Serrano R, Ridocci-Soriano F.
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2010 Feb; 63(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 20191700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using helical scan computed tomography.
    Ueyama K, Ohashi H, Tsutsumi Y, Kawai T, Ueda T, Ohnaka M.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Mar; 46(3):322-6. PubMed ID: 10348130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of multidetector 64-slice computed tomographic angiography to coronary angiography to assess the patency of coronary artery bypass grafts.
    Jabara R, Chronos N, Klein L, Eisenberg S, Allen R, Bradford S, Frohwein S.
    Am J Cardiol; 2007 Jun 01; 99(11):1529-34. PubMed ID: 17531575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Visualization of aorto-coronary bypass grafts with the aid of non-dynamic computer tomography].
    Daniel W, Döhring W, Elgeti H, Lichtlen PR, Stender HS, Borst HG.
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1980 Nov 08; 110(45):1654-7. PubMed ID: 6974394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A randomized comparison of intraoperative indocyanine green angiography and transit-time flow measurement to detect technical errors in coronary bypass grafts.
    Desai ND, Miwa S, Kodama D, Koyama T, Cohen G, Pelletier MP, Cohen EA, Christakis GT, Goldman BS, Fremes SE.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Sep 08; 132(3):585-94. PubMed ID: 16935114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [A comparison of ultrafast computed tomography, magnetic resonance angiography and selective angiography for the detection of coronary bypass patency].
    von Smekal A, Knez A, Seelos KC, Haberl R, Spiegl F, Reichart B, Steinbeck G, Reiser M.
    Rofo; 1997 Mar 08; 166(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 9156587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Multislice CT evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patients.
    Gilkeson RC, Markowitz AH.
    J Thorac Imaging; 2007 Feb 08; 22(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 17325577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.