These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


362 related items for PubMed ID: 16026435

  • 1. Complementary role of adjunctive breast magnetic resonance imaging and scintimammography in patients of all ages undergoing breast cancer surgery.
    Howarth D, Slater S, Lau P, Booker J, Clark D, Sillar R.
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Aug; 49(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 16026435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of mammographic breast lesions with Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography and contrast enhanced MRI.
    Sommer H, Tiling R, Pechmann M, Kindermann G, Kress K, Moser R, Tatsch K, Hahn K, Pfluger T, Assemi C.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997 Aug; 119(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 9050197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Detection and prediction of breast cancer using double phase Tc-99m MIBI scintimammography in comparison with MRI.
    Kim IJ, Kim YK, Kim SJ.
    Onkologie; 2009 Oct; 32(10):556-60. PubMed ID: 19816071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
    Duarte GM, Cabello C, Torresan RZ, Alvarenga M, Telles GH, Bianchessi ST, Caserta N, Segala SR, de Lima Mda C, Etchebehere EC, Camargo EE, Tinois E.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F, Catalano C, Roselli A, Dominelli V, Cagioli S, Karatasiou A, Pronio A, Kirchin MA, Passariello R.
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Evaluation of scintimammography as an additional test to conventional mammography in detection of breast cancer].
    Cwikła JB, Buscombe JR, Kolasińska AD, Holloway B, Hilson AJ.
    Ginekol Pol; 2003 May; 74(5):362-70. PubMed ID: 12931463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.
    Riedl CC, Ponhold L, Flöry D, Weber M, Kroiss R, Wagner T, Fuchsjäger M, Helbich TH.
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct 15; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size.
    Linda A, Zuiani C, Londero V, Bazzocchi M.
    Breast; 2008 Feb 15; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment.
    Schelfout K, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E, Colpaert C, Schelfhout AM, Leyman P, Verslegers I, Biltjes I, Van Den Haute J, Gillardin JP, Tjalma W, Van Der Auwera JC, Buytaert P, De Schepper A.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Jun 15; 30(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 15135477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [The "EVA" Trial: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Diagnostic Methods (Mammography, Ultrasound, MRI) in the secondary and tertiary prevention of familial breast cancer. Preliminary results after the first half of the study period].
    Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Weigel S, Nüssle-Kügele K, Sittek H, Arand B, Morakkabati N, Leutner C, Tombach B, Nordhoff D, Perlet C, Rieber A, Heindel W, Brambs HJ, Schild H.
    Rofo; 2005 Jun 15; 177(6):818-27. PubMed ID: 15902631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Invasive lobular carcinoma: detection with mammography, sonography, MRI, and breast-specific gamma imaging.
    Brem RF, Ioffe M, Rapelyea JA, Yost KG, Weigert JM, Bertrand ML, Stern LH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb 15; 192(2):379-83. PubMed ID: 19155397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection.
    Malich A, Boehm T, Facius M, Freesmeyer MG, Fleck M, Anderson R, Kaiser WA.
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Apr 15; 56(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 11286578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.