These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. What has a decade of Daubert wrought? Berger MA. Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S59-65. PubMed ID: 16030340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Trial and error: the Supreme Court's philosophy of science. Haack S. Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S66-73. PubMed ID: 16030341 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The perils of relying on interested parties to evaluate scientific quality. Wagner W. Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S99-106. PubMed ID: 16030346 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The (near) irrelevance of Daubert to criminal justice and some suggestions for reform. Neufeld PJ. Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S107-13. PubMed ID: 16030325 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Science and regulation: current impasse and future solutions. Hoppin PJ, Clapp R. Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S8-S12. PubMed ID: 16030343 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Daubert and the proper role for the courts in health, safety, and environmental regulation. McGarity TO. Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S92-8. PubMed ID: 16030345 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]