These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

388 related items for PubMed ID: 16044596

  • 1. The unconstitutional treatment of Nancy Cruzan.
    Gasner MR.
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1990; 7(Part 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 16044596
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Euthanasia and the right to die: Nancy Cruzan and New Mexico.
    Schwartz RL.
    N M Law Rev; 1990; 20(3):675-700. PubMed ID: 12186059
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Peters PG.
    Ohio State Law J; 1989; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law.
    Bopp J, Avila D.
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Deciding for others: New York law and the rights of incompetent persons to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment.
    Martino M.
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1996; 41(1):285-308. PubMed ID: 12718312
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Cruzan decision -- a surgeon's perspective.
    McNoble DJ.
    Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(4):569-610. PubMed ID: 11652628
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Nutrition and hydration in PVS individuals: the Cruzan, Bland and Englaro cases.
    Baron CH.
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(65):181-4. PubMed ID: 15505920
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The Cruzan decision: 9.5 theses for discussion.
    Meilaender G.
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1990; 6(4):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 16038071
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Nancy Cruzan dies, outlived by a debate over the right to die.
    Lewin T.
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Dec 27; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646795
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty.
    Bopp J, Avila D.
    Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr 27; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence.
    Roach CA.
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991 Apr 27; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Nancy Cruzan and the best interest standard.
    Veatch RM.
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1990 Apr 27; 6(4):17-9. PubMed ID: 16038072
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
    McLean ED.
    Emory Law J; 1991 Apr 27; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
    Harner SR.
    Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991 Apr 27; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law.
    Goldmeier KE.
    MD Law Rev; 1994 Apr 27; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Right to refuse life sustaining medical treatment and the noncompetent nonterminally ill patient: an analysis of abridgment and anarchy.
    Adamson EH.
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1990 Apr 27; 17(2):461-92. PubMed ID: 16047420
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Exercising the right to die: a proposal for New York.
    Caffera SM.
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1991 Apr 27; 42(4):1189-240. PubMed ID: 16130264
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clear and convincing evidence: the case of Nancy Cruzan.
    McCormick RA.
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1990 Apr 27; 6(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 16038076
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia.
    Davidson SI.
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994 Apr 27; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Refusal of hydration and nutrition: irrelevance of the "artificial" vs "natural" distinction.
    Truog RD, Cochrane TI.
    Arch Intern Med; 1994 Apr 27; 165(22):2574-6. PubMed ID: 16344412
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.