These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

336 related items for PubMed ID: 16044600

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
    Kendall CC.
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Mum's the word: the Supreme Court and family planning.
    Mariner WK.
    Am J Public Health; 1992 Feb; 82(2):296-301. PubMed ID: 1739169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Law, medicine, and the "gag rule".
    Ball JR.
    Ann Intern Med; 1991 Sep 01; 115(5):403-4. PubMed ID: 1863032
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral.
    Hirt TC.
    Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun 01; 101():1895-915. PubMed ID: 11655923
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Abortion law today.
    Field MA.
    J Leg Med; 1993 Mar 01; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Celebrating the Bill of Rights in the year of Rust v. Sullivan.
    Murphy E.
    Nurs Outlook; 1991 Mar 01; 39(5):238-9. PubMed ID: 1896319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice.
    Berg P.
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar 01; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. "Rust v. Sullivan".
    Rhodes AM.
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1991 Mar 01; 16(6):329-30. PubMed ID: 1749321
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Five justices uphold U.S. rule curbing abortion advice Some clinics to still advise but forgo aid.
    Greenhouse L, Brozan N.
    N Y Times Web; 1991 May 24; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 11647436
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
    Weissmann R.
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1999 May 24; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Roe v. Wade and the euthanasia debate.
    Bopp J, Coleson RE.
    Issues Law Med; 1997 May 24; 12(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 9114604
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.