These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

492 related items for PubMed ID: 16045308

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. SeleX-CS: a new consensus scoring algorithm for hit discovery and lead optimization.
    Bar-Haim S, Aharon A, Ben-Moshe T, Marantz Y, Senderowitz H.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Mar; 49(3):623-33. PubMed ID: 19231809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Considerations in compound database preparation--"hidden" impact on virtual screening results.
    Knox AJ, Meegan MJ, Carta G, Lloyd DG.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005 Mar; 45(6):1908-19. PubMed ID: 16309298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN, Abagyan RA.
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar 12; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A pharmacophore-based evolutionary approach for screening selective estrogen receptor modulators.
    Yang JM, Shen TW.
    Proteins; 2005 May 01; 59(2):205-20. PubMed ID: 15726586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Retrospective docking study of PDE4B ligands and an analysis of the behavior of selected scoring functions.
    Mpamhanga CP, Chen B, McLay IM, Ormsby DL, Lindvall MK.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005 May 01; 45(4):1061-74. PubMed ID: 16045302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fast structure-based virtual ligand screening combining FRED, DOCK, and Surflex.
    Miteva MA, Lee WH, Montes MO, Villoutreix BO.
    J Med Chem; 2005 Sep 22; 48(19):6012-22. PubMed ID: 16162004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Virtual screening to enrich a compound collection with CDK2 inhibitors using docking, scoring, and composite scoring models.
    Cotesta S, Giordanetto F, Trosset JY, Crivori P, Kroemer RT, Stouten PF, Vulpetti A.
    Proteins; 2005 Sep 01; 60(4):629-43. PubMed ID: 16028223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Physics-based scoring of protein-ligand complexes: enrichment of known inhibitors in large-scale virtual screening.
    Huang N, Kalyanaraman C, Irwin JJ, Jacobson MP.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006 Sep 01; 46(1):243-53. PubMed ID: 16426060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Supervised scoring models with docked ligand conformations for structure-based virtual screening.
    Teramoto R, Fukunishi H.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007 Sep 01; 47(5):1858-67. PubMed ID: 17685604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
    Perola E, Walters WP, Charifson PS.
    Proteins; 2004 Aug 01; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.