These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech 247 diagnostic station blood pressure measurement device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the International Protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards. Polo Friz H, Facchetti R, Primitz L, Beltrame L, Galbiati V, Ricioppo A, Bombelli M, Sega R. Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):222-7. PubMed ID: 19741510 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making. Stergiou GS, Lourida P, Tzamouranis D. J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children. Wong SN, Tz Sung RY, Leung LC. Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K. Lancet; 1990 Dec 15; 336(8729):1465-8. PubMed ID: 1979092 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes? Li S, Zhao X, Ba S, He F, Lam CT, Ke L, Li N, Yan LL, Li X, Wu Y. Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr 15; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical validation of an automatic device measuring blood pressure in the fingers. Arosio E, Zannoni M. Panminerva Med; 1999 Jun 15; 41(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 10479914 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer underestimate blood pressure, and by how much? Mackie A, Whincup P, McKinnon M. J Hum Hypertens; 1995 May 15; 9(5):337-43. PubMed ID: 7623370 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010. Ostchega Y, Zhang G, Sorlie P, Hughes JP, Reed-Gillette DS, Nwankwo T, Yoon S. Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct 05; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between an automated device and a manual mercury sphygmomanometer in an epidemiological survey of hypertension prevalence. Lim YH, Choi SY, Oh KW, Kim Y, Cho ES, Choi BY, Kim YM, Shin J. Am J Hypertens; 2014 Apr 05; 27(4):537-45. PubMed ID: 23764377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor. Stergiou GS, Karpettas N, Kollias A, Destounis A, Tzamouranis D. J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr 05; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Agreement of blood pressure measurements between random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers. Yang W, Gu D, Chen J, Jaquish CE, Rao DC, Wu X, Hixson JE, Duan X, Kelly TN, Hamm LL, Whelton PK, He J, GenSalt Collaborative Research Group. Am J Med Sci; 2008 Nov 05; 336(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 19011391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Samsung SBM-100A and Microlife BP 3BU1-5 wrist blood pressure measuring devices in adults according to the International Protocol. Altunkan S, Ilman N, Altunkan E. Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr 05; 12(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 17353656 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of three automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol: The Omron M3 Intellisense (HEM-7051-E), the Omron M2 Compact (HEM 7102-E), and the Omron R3-I Plus (HEM 6022-E). Asmar R, Khabouth J, Topouchian J, El Feghali R, Mattar J. Blood Press Monit; 2010 Feb 05; 15(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 20032779 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]