These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

124 related items for PubMed ID: 16053852

  • 1. Histology of the porcine mandibular distraction wound.
    Zimmermann CE, Thurmüller P, Troulis MJ, Perrott DH, Rahn B, Kaban LB.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jun; 34(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 16053852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible: histomorphometric evaluation of bone.
    Glowacki J, Shusterman EM, Troulis M, Holmes R, Perrott D, Kaban LB.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Feb; 113(2):566-73. PubMed ID: 14758219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Assessment of bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction wound by computed tomography.
    Zimmermann CE, Harris G, Thurmüller P, Troulis MJ, Perrott DH, Rahn B, Kaban LB.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Sep; 33(6):569-74. PubMed ID: 15308257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Histomorphometric analysis of the porcine mandibular distraction wound.
    Lawler ME, Tayebaty FT, Williams WB, Troulis MJ, Kaban LB.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1543-54. PubMed ID: 20561467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Development of distraction osteogenesis model of the inferior mandibular border and alveolar bone.
    Moon HS, Kim HJ, Teribish M, Park JT, Cha JY.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):715-9. PubMed ID: 21415642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Bilateral mandibular distraction in adult dogs with an epiperiosteal distractor.
    Hasse AR, Pörksen M, Zimmermann CE.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 43(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 15749209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Guided tissue regeneration enhances bone formation in a rat model of failed osteogenesis.
    Fang TD, Nacamuli RP, Song HJ, Fong KD, Shi YY, Longaker MT.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Apr; 117(4):1177-85. PubMed ID: 16582784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. IGF-I, TGF-beta, and BMP-4 are expressed during distraction osteogenesis of the pig mandible.
    Yates KE, Troulis MJ, Kaban LB, Glowacki J.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Apr; 31(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 12102416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of intermittent parathyroid hormone treatment on new bone formation during distraction osteogenesis in the rat mandible.
    Ali MN, Kobayashi T, Tanaka M, Ohshima H, Ejiri S, Saito C.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Jul; 114(1):e36-42. PubMed ID: 22727105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Histologic study of the cellular events during rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Ali MN, Ejiri S, Kobayashi T, Anwar RB, Oda K, Ohshima H, Saito C.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 18805717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Correlation of biomechanical stiffness with plain radiographic and ultrasound data in an experimental mandibular distraction wound.
    Kaban LB, Thurmüller P, Troulis MJ, Glowacki J, Wahl D, Linke B, Rahn B, Perrott DH.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Jun; 32(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 12767878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Bilateral Continuous Automated Distraction Osteogenesis: Proof of Principle.
    Peacock ZS, Tricomi BJ, Faquin WC, Magill JC, Murphy BA, Kaban LB, Troulis MJ.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 26(8):2320-4. PubMed ID: 26594967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Does the sheep mandible relapse following lengthening by distraction osteogenesis?
    McTavish J, Marucci DD, Bonar SF, Walsh WR, Poole MD.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2000 Oct; 28(5):251-7. PubMed ID: 11467387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Use of ultrasound to assess healing of a mandibular distraction wound.
    Thurmüller P, Troulis M, O'Neill MJ, Kaban LB.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Sep; 60(9):1038-44. PubMed ID: 12215991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of canine mandibular bone regeneration by distraction osteogenesis versus acute resection and rigid external fixation.
    Gosain AK, Kalantarian B, Song LS, Larson JD, Jenkins CA, Wilson CR.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Nov; 114(6):1490-9; discussion 1500-1. PubMed ID: 15509937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of the effects of guided bone regeneration and periosteum on newly formed bone in a distraction gap.
    Kilic E, Alkan A, Demetoglu U, Ozturk M.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1871-4. PubMed ID: 21959452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Biomechanical analysis of the effect of mesenchymal stem cells on mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Aykan A, Ozturk S, Sahin I, Gurses S, Ural AU, Oren NC, Isik S.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):e169-75. PubMed ID: 23524827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) on bone consolidation on distraction osteogenesis: a preliminary study in rabbit mandibles.
    Yonezawa H, Harada K, Ikebe T, Shinohara M, Enomoto S.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 34(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 16790354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Intraoral widening and lengthening of the mandible in baboons by distraction osteogenesis.
    Bell WH, Gonzalez M, Samchukov ML, Guerrero CA.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 May; 57(5):548-62; discussion 563. PubMed ID: 10319829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Changes in the inferior alveolar vessels and angiogenesis following mandibular lengthening with different rates of distraction].
    Tang Z, Zou S, Hu J.
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Jun; 20(3):203-5, 224. PubMed ID: 12600067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.