These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

367 related items for PubMed ID: 16082863

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Predicting the present: expert testimony and civil commitment.
    Schopp RF, Quattrocchi MR.
    Behav Sci Law; 1995; 13(2):159-81. PubMed ID: 10150376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Science, justice, and evidence.
    Mnookin J.
    Science; 2023 Nov 17; 382(6672):741. PubMed ID: 37972152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The admissibility of offender profiling in courtroom: a review of legal issues and court opinions.
    Bosco D, Zappalà A, Santtila P.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010 Nov 17; 33(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 20416950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Admissibility and per se exclusion of hypnotically elicited recall in American courts of law.
    Perry C.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul 17; 45(3):266-79. PubMed ID: 9204639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The expert witness. Neither Frye nor Daubert solved the problem: what can be done?
    Kaufman HH.
    Sci Justice; 2001 Jul 17; 41(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 11215302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Osteopathic physicians and expert medical testimony.
    McAbee GN.
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1997 Jan 17; 97(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 9029880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Post-Daubert admissibility of scientific evidence on malingering of cognitive deficits.
    Vallabhajosula B, van Gorp WG.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001 Jan 17; 29(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 11471788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert.
    Cecil JS.
    Am J Public Health; 2005 Jan 17; 95 Suppl 1():S74-80. PubMed ID: 16030342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Should human figure drawings be admitted into court?
    Lally SJ.
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Feb 17; 76(1):135-49. PubMed ID: 11206294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Evaluating science outside the trial box: applying Daubert to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines' criminal history score.
    Krauss DA.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006 Feb 17; 29(4):289-305. PubMed ID: 16530267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.