These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

174 related items for PubMed ID: 16083080

  • 1. Expert testimony by ethicists: what should be the norm?
    Imwinkelried EJ.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):198-221. PubMed ID: 16083080
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Is there any indication for ethics evidence? An argument for the admissibility of some expert bioethics testimony.
    Nelson LJ.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):248-63. PubMed ID: 16083084
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Bioethics testimony: untangling the strands and testing their reliability.
    Spielman BJ.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 16083081
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Expert bioethics testimony.
    Latham SR.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):242-7. PubMed ID: 16083083
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Introduction: bioethics in court.
    Rich BA.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):194-7. PubMed ID: 16083079
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Imwinkelried's argument for normative ethical testimony.
    Barnes DW.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 16083082
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The roles of ethicists in managed care litigation.
    Majumder MA.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):264-73. PubMed ID: 16083085
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Ethics expertise in civil litigation.
    Kipnis K.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):274-8. PubMed ID: 16083086
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Ethics expert testimony: against the skeptics.
    Agich GJ, Spielman BJ.
    J Med Philos; 1997 Aug; 22(4):381-403. PubMed ID: 9309551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Bioethics in a legal forum: confessions of an "expert" witness.
    Fletcher JC.
    J Med Philos; 1997 Aug; 22(4):297-324. PubMed ID: 9309546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The future of bioethics testimony: guidelines for determining qualifications, reliability, and helpfulness.
    Spielman B, Agich G.
    San Diego Law Rev; 1999 Aug; 36(4):1043-75. PubMed ID: 12449932
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Medical ethics in the courtroom: a reappraisal.
    Sharpe VA, Pellegrino ED.
    J Med Philos; 1997 Aug; 22(4):373-9. PubMed ID: 9309550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Bioethics, expertise, and the courts: an overview and an argument for inevitability.
    Morreim EH.
    J Med Philos; 1997 Aug; 22(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 9309545
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Healthy skepticism: the emperor has very few clothes.
    Wildes KW.
    J Med Philos; 1997 Aug; 22(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 9309549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Bioethics on trial.
    Caplan AL.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1991 Aug; 21(2):19-20. PubMed ID: 2045277
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Proffering bioethicists as experts.
    Mishkin DB.
    Judges J; 1997 Aug; 36(3):50-51, 88-89. PubMed ID: 11656823
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. At law. Experts.
    Schneider CE.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2001 Aug; 31(4):10-1. PubMed ID: 12945461
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Rebuttal: expert ethics testimony.
    Baylis F.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2000 Aug; 28(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 11210375
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Facts, values, and expert testimony.
    Capron AM.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1993 Aug; 23(5):26-8. PubMed ID: 8262766
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The reluctant retained witness: alleged sexual misconduct in the doctor/patient relationship.
    Yarborough M.
    J Med Philos; 1997 Aug; 22(4):345-64. PubMed ID: 9309548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.