These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

135 related items for PubMed ID: 1609106

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.
    Chotas HG, Ravin CE.
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 11230639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
    Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M, Schmidt A, Neitzel U, Galanski M.
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2K versus 4K matrix size on observer performance.
    Miró SP, Leung AN, Rubin GD, Choi YH, Kee ST, Mindelzun RE, Stark P, Wexler L, Plevritis SK, Betts BJ.
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 11161174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. High frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines. Parity between storage phosphor digital images and conventional chest radiography.
    Oestmann JW, Greene R, Rubens JR, Pile-Spellman E, Hall D, Robertson C, Llewellyn HJ, McCarthy KA, Potsaid M, White G.
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Sep; 24(9):643-6. PubMed ID: 2807816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Improved control of image optical density with low-dose digital and conventional radiography in bedside imaging.
    Schaefer CM, Greene RE, Oestmann JW, Kamalsky JM, Hall DA, Llewellyn HJ, Robertson CL, Rhea JT, Rosenthal H, Rubens JR.
    Radiology; 1989 Dec; 173(3):713-6. PubMed ID: 2813775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Konen E, Greenberg I, Rozenman J.
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats.
    MacMahon H, Metz CE, Doi K, Kim T, Giger ML, Chan HP.
    Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):669-73. PubMed ID: 3406396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. Evaluation of diagnostic performance and patient exposure.
    Månsson LG, Kheddache S, Schlossman D, Börjesson J, Håkansson E, Mattsson S, Tylén U.
    Acta Radiol; 1989 Sep; 30(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 2775592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.
    Razavi M, Sayre JW, Taira RK, Simons M, Huang HK, Chuang KS, Rahbar G, Kangarloo H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs.
    Goo JM, Choi JY, Im JG, Lee HJ, Chung MJ, Han D, Park SH, Kim JH, Nam SH.
    Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):762-6. PubMed ID: 15273338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of an enhanced digital film-duplication system by receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Hoffmann KR, MacMahon H, Doi K, Metz CE, Yao L, Abe K.
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Dec; 28(12):1134-8. PubMed ID: 8307717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Metz S, Damoser P, Hollweck R, Roggel R, Engelke C, Woertler K, Renger B, Rummeny EJ, Link TM.
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.