These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


271 related items for PubMed ID: 16091317

  • 1. Should loose fascial sutures be removed in the 1st postoperative week in patients with superficial wound dehiscence and intact fascia after caesarean section using a Pfannenstiel incision?
    Lurie S, Mamet Y.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 May; 25(4):355-6. PubMed ID: 16091317
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
    Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW.
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Suture materials and subsequent wound strength.
    MacLean AB, MacLean SB.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Aug; 28(6):561-2. PubMed ID: 19003645
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A randomized clinical trial of two surgical techniques for cesarean section.
    Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Balestreri D, Beretta P, Maymon E, Miglierina M, Bolis PF.
    Am J Perinatol; 1998 Aug; 15(10):589-94. PubMed ID: 9926882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Obesity and the challenges of caesarean delivery: prevention and management of wound complications.
    Ayres-de-Campos D.
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Apr; 29(3):406-14. PubMed ID: 25457856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Reclosure of disrupted abdominal incisions.
    Walters MD, Dombroski RA, Davidson SA, Mandel PC, Gibbs RS.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Oct; 76(4):597-602. PubMed ID: 2216186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prevention of sternal dehiscence and infection in high-risk patients: a prospective randomized multicenter trial.
    Schimmer C, Reents W, Berneder S, Eigel P, Sezer O, Scheld H, Sahraoui K, Gansera B, Deppert O, Rubio A, Feyrer R, Sauer C, Elert O, Leyh R.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Dec; 86(6):1897-904. PubMed ID: 19022005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Drainage at caesarean section--a randomised prospective study.
    Maharaj D, Bagratee JS, Moodley J.
    S Afr J Surg; 2000 May; 38(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 12365120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Single-layer or double-layer suturing of the uterine incision in cesarean section? The late prognosis].
    Iankov M.
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1999 May; 38(4):11-2. PubMed ID: 10726342
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Closure of the subcutaneous dead space and wound disruption after Cesarean delivery.
    Chelmow D, Huang E, Strohbehn K.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Jun; 11(6):403-8. PubMed ID: 12389657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Abdominal wound healing following caesarean section.
    Bright MV.
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1974 Sep; 19(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 4606166
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A randomized comparison of secondary closure and secondary intention in patients with superficial wound dehiscence.
    Dodson MK, Magann EF, Meeks GR.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):321-4. PubMed ID: 1495686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Cesarean section using single-layer transisthmic uterine sutures].
    Koppel E, Struzyk B, Zbieszczyk J.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1983 Sep; 105(23):1522-5. PubMed ID: 6364647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Abdominal wound dehiscence after caesarean section.
    Mowat J, Bonnar J.
    Br Med J; 1971 May 01; 2(5756):256-7. PubMed ID: 5572385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.