These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

151 related items for PubMed ID: 160941

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The social and policy context of the Act.
    West J.
    Milbank Q; 1991; 69 Suppl 1-2():3-24. PubMed ID: 1837836
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. What does due process do?
    Kirp DL, Jensen DN.
    Public Interest; 1983; (73):75-90. PubMed ID: 10317381
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Politics and policy in the history of the disability rights movement.
    Scotch RK.
    Milbank Q; 1989; 67 Suppl 2 Pt 2():380-400. PubMed ID: 2534157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Circumventing environmental policy: does the Americans with Disabilities Act provide protection where environmental statutes don't?
    Heyl MS.
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 18(1):323-57. PubMed ID: 15255064
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Social security for the physically and mentally handicapped and provision for rehabilitation services in East Germany].
    Ulbricht H.
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1981; 27(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 6455866
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Medical proof, social policy, and Social Security's medically centered definition of disability.
    Bloch FS.
    Cornell Law Rev; 2007 Jan; 92(2):189-234. PubMed ID: 17297749
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Nondiscrimination based on handicap in federally assisted programs--implementation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Executive Order 11914. Department of Justice--proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1979 Sep 21; 44(185):54950-67. PubMed ID: 10316865
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Public policy affecting universal design.
    Peterson W.
    Assist Technol; 1998 Sep 21; 10(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 10181146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The antidiscrimination model reconsidered: ensuring equal opportunity without respect to handicap under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
    Wegner JW.
    Cornell Law Rev; 1984 Mar 21; 69(3):401-516. PubMed ID: 10317437
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. For the handicapped, rights but no welcome.
    Will GF.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Jun 21; 16(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 2941392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Lethal pity: the Oregon Death with Dignity Act, its implications for the disabled, and the struggle for equality in an able-bodied world.
    Siegel MC.
    Law Inequal; 1998 Jun 21; 16(1):259-88. PubMed ID: 11657332
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The rehabilitation agency and the civil rights of clients: an analysis of strategies for policy implementation.
    Burton L.
    J Rehabil; 1982 Jun 21; 48(2):46-52. PubMed ID: 7175869
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.