These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
244 related items for PubMed ID: 1609738
1. Floor/shoe slip resistance measurement. Chaffin DB, Woldstad JC, Trujillo A. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 May; 53(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1609738 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of shoe sole tread groove depth on the friction coefficient with different tread groove widths, floors and contaminants. Li KW, Wu HH, Lin YC. Appl Ergon; 2006 Nov; 37(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 16427022 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of load carrying and floor contaminants on slip and fall parameters. Myung R, Smith JL. Ergonomics; 1997 Feb; 40(2):235-46. PubMed ID: 9118934 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of workers' shoe wear on objective and subjective assessment of slipperiness. Chiou SY, Bhattacharya A, Succop PA. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Sep; 57(9):825-31. PubMed ID: 8865591 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical gait analysis for the extraction of slip resistance test parameters. Fischer H, Kirchberg S, Moessner T. Ind Health; 2009 Dec; 47(6):617-25. PubMed ID: 19996537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Friction between footwear and floor covered with solid particles under dry and wet conditions. Li KW, Meng F, Zhang W. Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2014 Dec; 20(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 24629869 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional levels of floor surface roughness for the prevention of slips and falls: clean-and-dry and soapsuds-covered wet surfaces. Kim IJ, Hsiao H, Simeonov P. Appl Ergon; 2013 Jan; 44(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 22641153 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of roughness, floor polish, water, oil and ice on underfoot friction: current safety footwear solings are less slip resistant than microcellular polyurethane. Manning DP, Jones C. Appl Ergon; 2001 Apr; 32(2):185-96. PubMed ID: 11277511 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in Friction Performance between New and Worn Shoes. Cook A, Hemler S, Sundaram V, Chanda A, Beschorner K. IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2020 Apr; 8(4):209-214. PubMed ID: 33955322 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of surface roughness in the measurement of slipperiness. Chang WR, Kim IJ, Manning DP, Bunterngchit Y. Ergonomics; 2001 Oct 20; 44(13):1200-16. PubMed ID: 11794764 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Shoe sole tread designs and outcomes of slipping and falling on slippery floor surfaces. Liu LW, Lee YH, Lin CJ, Li KW, Chen CY. PLoS One; 2013 Oct 20; 8(7):e68989. PubMed ID: 23894388 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychophysically determined horizontal and vertical forces of dynamic pushing on high and low coefficient of friction floors for female industrial workers. Ciriello VM. J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Mar 20; 2(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 15764537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The validity and reliability of a portable slip meter for determining floor slipperiness during simulated heel strike. Grönqvist R, Hirvonen M, Rajamäki E, Matz S. Accid Anal Prev; 2003 Mar 20; 35(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 12504142 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanics of slips. Redfern MS, Cham R, Gielo-Perczak K, Grönqvist R, Hirvonen M, Lanshammar H, Marpet M, Pai CY, Powers C. Ergonomics; 2001 Oct 20; 44(13):1138-66. PubMed ID: 11794762 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]