These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

353 related items for PubMed ID: 16098077

  • 1. C-reactive protein and D-dimer with clinical probability score in the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.
    Steeghs N, Goekoop RJ, Niessen RW, Jonkers GJ, Dik H, Huisman MV.
    Br J Haematol; 2005 Aug; 130(4):614-9. PubMed ID: 16098077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Outcomes of high pretest probability patients undergoing d-dimer testing for pulmonary embolism: a pilot study.
    Kabrhel C.
    J Emerg Med; 2008 Nov; 35(4):373-7. PubMed ID: 18343077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Screening for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in outpatients with suspected DVT or PE by the sequential use of clinical score: a sensitive quantitative D-dimer test and noninvasive diagnostic tools.
    Michiels JJ, Gadisseur A, van der Planken M, Schroyens W, De Maeseneer M, Hermsen JT, Trienekens PH, Hoogsteden H, Pattynama PM.
    Semin Vasc Med; 2005 Nov; 5(4):351-64. PubMed ID: 16302156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Application of a novel and rapid whole blood assay for D-dimer in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism.
    Ginsberg JS, Wells PS, Brill-Edwards P, Donovan D, Panju A, van Beek EJ, Patel A.
    Thromb Haemost; 1995 Jan; 73(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 7740493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Exclusion of pulmonary embolism using C-reactive protein and D-dimer. A prospective comparison.
    Aujesky D, Hayoz D, Yersin B, Perrier A, Barghouth G, Schnyder P, Bischof-Delaloye A, Cornuz J.
    Thromb Haemost; 2003 Dec; 90(6):1198-203. PubMed ID: 14652657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Different accuracies of rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent, turbidimetric, and agglutination D-dimer assays for thrombosis exclusion: impact on diagnostic work-ups of outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
    Michiels JJ, Gadisseur A, van der Planken M, Schroyens W, De Maeseneer M, Hermsen JT, Trienekens PH, Hoogsteden H, Pattynama PM.
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2006 Oct; 32(7):678-93. PubMed ID: 17024595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Clinical usefulness of D-dimer depending on clinical probability and cutoff value in outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
    Righini M, Aujesky D, Roy PM, Cornuz J, de Moerloose P, Bounameaux H, Perrier A.
    Arch Intern Med; 2006 Oct; 164(22):2483-7. PubMed ID: 15596640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of D-dimer ELISA test in elderly patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
    Tardy B, Tardy-Poncet B, Viallon A, Lafond P, Page Y, Venet C, Bertrand JC.
    Thromb Haemost; 1998 Jan; 79(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 9459319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Exclusion of venous thromboembolism: evaluation of D-Dimer PLUS for the quantitative determination of D-dimer.
    Vermeer HJ, Ypma P, van Strijen MJ, Muradin AA, Hudig F, Jansen RW, Wijermans PW, Gerrits WB.
    Thromb Res; 2005 Jan; 115(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 15733971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside with low pre-test probability and D-dimer: safety and clinical utility of 4 methods to assign pre-test probability.
    Carrier M, Wells PS, Rodger MA.
    Thromb Res; 2006 Jan; 117(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 15893807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of the clinical usefulness of two quantitative D-Dimer tests in patients with a low clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.
    Djurabi RK, Klok FA, Nijkeuter M, Kaasjager K, Kamphuisen PW, Kramer MH, Kruip MJ, Leebeek FW, Büller HR, Huisman MV.
    Thromb Res; 2009 Mar; 123(5):771-4. PubMed ID: 18814904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Tandem measurement of D-dimer and myeloperoxidase or C-reactive protein to effectively screen for pulmonary embolism in the emergency department.
    Mitchell AM, Nordenholz KE, Kline JA.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Sep; 15(9):800-5. PubMed ID: 18821859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Validity and clinical utility of the simplified Wells rule for assessing clinical probability for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.
    Douma RA, Gibson NS, Gerdes VE, Büller HR, Wells PS, Perrier A, Le Gal G.
    Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jan; 101(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 19132208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer.
    Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, Bormanis J, Weitz J, Chamberlain M, Bowie D, Barnes D, Hirsh J.
    Thromb Haemost; 2000 Mar; 83(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 10744147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Value of D-dimer testing for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in patients with previous venous thromboembolism.
    Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Aujesky D, Perrier A, Bounameaux H.
    Arch Intern Med; 2006 Jan 23; 166(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 16432085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. D-dimer and thrombin-antithrombin III complexes in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism.
    Demers C, Ginsberg JS, Johnston M, Brill-Edwards P, Panju A.
    Thromb Haemost; 1992 Apr 02; 67(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 1631787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The value of four-detector row spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
    Vigo M, Pesavento R, Bova C, Porro F, Ghirarduzzi A, Bazzan M, Polverosi R, Frulla M, Noto A, Castelli R, Giovanardi F, Angelini F, Pagnan A, Prandoni P, SCENIC Investigators Group.
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2006 Nov 02; 32(8):831-7. PubMed ID: 17171597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Potential impact of adjusting the threshold of the quantitative D-dimer based on pretest probability of acute pulmonary embolism.
    Kabrhel C, Mark Courtney D, Camargo CA, Moore CL, Richman PB, Plewa MC, Nordenholtz KE, Smithline HA, Beam DM, Brown MD, Kline JA.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Apr 02; 16(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 19298619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.