These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


732 related items for PubMed ID: 16101950

  • 1. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
    Fernandes P, Díaz-Rey JA, Queirós A, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Jorge J.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of the IOPen and iCare rebound tonometers with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
    Jorge J, Fernandes P, Queirós A, Ribeiro P, Garcês C, Gonzalez-Meijome JM.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Jan; 30(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 20444114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer.
    Davies LN, Bartlett H, Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 16637838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Three portable tonometers, the TGDc-01, the ICARE and the Tonopen XL, compared with each other and with Goldmann applanation tonometry*.
    van der Jagt LH, Jansonius NM.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 16101949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
    Nakamura M, Darhad U, Tatsumi Y, Fujioka M, Kusuhara A, Maeda H, Negi A.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer by experienced and inexperienced tonometrists.
    Abraham LM, Epasinghe NC, Selva D, Casson R.
    Eye (Lond); 2008 Apr; 22(4):503-6. PubMed ID: 17159973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Pakrou N, Gray T, Mills R, Landers J, Craig J.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Apr; 17(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18303384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting.
    Kim KN, Jeoung JW, Park KH, Yang MK, Kim DM.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects.
    Kato Y, Nakakura S, Matsuo N, Yoshitomi K, Handa M, Tabuchi H, Kiuchi Y.
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):687-696. PubMed ID: 28393323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The accuracy of continued clinical use of goldmann applanation tonometers with known calibration errors.
    Sandhu SS, Chattopadhyay S, Amariotakis GA, Skarmoutsos F, Birch MK, Ray-Chaudhuri N.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan; 116(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18801579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [A comparison of rebound tonometry (ICare) with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry].
    Schreiber W, Vorwerk CK, Langenbucher A, Behrens-Baumann W, Viestenz A.
    Ophthalmologe; 2007 Apr; 104(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 17333073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 37.