These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


163 related items for PubMed ID: 16104437

  • 1. Immersed membrane bioreactor (IMBR) for treatment of combined domestic and dairy wastewater in an isolated farm.
    Bick A, Tuttle JG, Shandalov S, Oron G.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(10):327-34. PubMed ID: 16104437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Dairy farm wastewater treatment by an advanced pond system.
    Craggs RJ, Tanner CC, Sukias JP, Davies-Colley RJ.
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 14510223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biodegradability evaluation of dairy effluents originated in selected sections of dairy production.
    Janczukowicz W, Zieliński M, Debowski M.
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(10):4199-205. PubMed ID: 17976980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Experimental investigation of oily wastewater treatment using combined membrane systems.
    Salahi A, Mohammadi T.
    Water Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 62(2):245-55. PubMed ID: 20651427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Application of membrane bioreactor system with full scale plant on livestock wastewater.
    Kim H, Kim HS, Yeom IT, Chae YB.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Jul; 51(6-7):465-71. PubMed ID: 16004009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparative study on the anaerobic membrane bioreactor performance during the treatment of domestic wastewaters of various origins.
    Saddoud A, Ellouze M, Dhouib A, Sayadi S.
    Environ Technol; 2006 Sep; 27(9):991-9. PubMed ID: 17067125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Immersed membrane bioreactors: an overview with special emphasis on anaerobic bioprocesses.
    Singhania RR, Christophe G, Perchet G, Troquet J, Larroche C.
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Oct; 122():171-80. PubMed ID: 22382296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment.
    De Wever H, Weiss S, Reemtsma T, Vereecken J, Müller J, Knepper T, Rörden O, Gonzalez S, Barcelo D, Dolores Hernando M.
    Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(4):935-45. PubMed ID: 17207834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Treatment of dairy wastewater by two-stage membrane operation with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration.
    Gong YW, Zhang HX, Cheng XN.
    Water Sci Technol; 2012 Feb; 65(5):915-9. PubMed ID: 22339027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Membrane technology for sustainable treated wastewater reuse: agricultural, environmental and hydrological considerations.
    Oron G, Gillerman L, Bick A, Manor Y, Buriakovsky N, Hagin J.
    Water Sci Technol; 2008 Feb; 57(9):1383-8. PubMed ID: 18496003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Performance of ultrafiltration membrane process combined with coagulation/sedimentation.
    Jang NY, Watanabe Y, Minegishi S.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Feb; 51(6-7):209-19. PubMed ID: 16003980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.