These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Direct comparison of four bacterial source tracking methods and use of composite data sets. Casarez EA, Pillai SD, Mott JB, Vargas M, Dean KE, Di Giovanni GD. J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 17650195 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study. Harwood VJ, Wiggins B, Hagedorn C, Ellender RD, Gooch J, Kern J, Samadpour M, Chapman AC, Robinson BJ, Thompson BC. J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 15382721 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Microbial source tracking in a rural watershed dominated by cattle. Graves AK, Hagedorn C, Brooks A, Hagedorn RL, Martin E. Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3729-39. PubMed ID: 17582454 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of ribotyping and antibiotic resistance patterns for identification of host sources of Escherichia coli strains. Samadpour M, Roberts MC, Kitts C, Mulugeta W, Alfi D. Lett Appl Microbiol; 2005 Aug; 40(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 15613004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Choice of indicator organism and library size considerations for phenotypic microbial source tracking by FAME profiling. Duran M, Yurtsever D, Dunaev T. Water Sci Technol; 2009 Aug; 60(10):2659-68. PubMed ID: 19923772 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]