These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


200 related items for PubMed ID: 16113036

  • 1. Prediction of post-treatment outcome after combined treatment with maxillary protraction and chincap appliances.
    Yoshida I, Yamaguchi N, Mizoguchi I.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 16113036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I, Shoji T, Mizoguchi I.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cephalometric variables to predict future success of early orthopedic Class III treatment.
    Ghiz MA, Ngan P, Gunel E.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 15775944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Treatment effects of bonded RME and vertical-pull chincup followed by fixed appliance in patients with increased vertical dimension.
    Schulz SO, McNamara JA, Baccetti T, Franchi L.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):326-36. PubMed ID: 16168329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Long-term stability of Class III treatment: rapid palatal expansion and protraction facemask vs LeFort I maxillary advancement osteotomy.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Janisse FN, Bayirli B.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e9-19. PubMed ID: 17208098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L, Chen R, Yang Y, Ji G, Shen G.
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of maxillary protraction and fixed appliance therapy in Class III patients.
    Arman A, Ufuk Toygar T, Abuhijleh E.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 16731542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV, McNamara JA, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Sarver DM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT, Ucuncü N, Yüksel S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY, Sampson WJ, Townsend GC, Hughes T.
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Craniofacial morphology in orthodontically treated patients of class III malocclusion with stable and unstable treatment outcomes.
    Tahmina K, Tanaka E, Tanne K.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 10842111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Maxillary protraction and chincap appliance treatment effects and long-term changes in skeletal class III patients.
    Yoshida I, Ishii H, Yamaguchi N, Mizoguchi I.
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Dec; 69(6):543-52. PubMed ID: 10593446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Treatment and post-treatment effects of facemask therapy on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class III subjects.
    Baccetti T, Franchi L, Mucedero M, Cozza P.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 19752018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of treatment and posttreatment changes of protraction facemask treatment using the PAR index.
    Ngan P, Yiu C.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 11029737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dentofacial effects of a modified tandem traction bow appliance.
    Atalay Z, Tortop T.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 20348164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Nonextraction treatment of a skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    León-Salazar V, Janson G, de Freitas MR, de Almeida RR, León-Salazar R.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):736-45. PubMed ID: 19892292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of maxillary protraction with or without expansion on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class III subjects.
    Mucedero M, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Cozza P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):777-81. PubMed ID: 19524838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
    Freitas MR, Lima DV, Freitas KM, Janson G, Henriques JF.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Facemask therapy with and without expansion.
    Tortop T, Keykubat A, Yuksel S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 17920499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.