These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


266 related items for PubMed ID: 16113931

  • 41. Evaluation of the cervical integrity during occlusal loading of Class II restorations.
    Campos PE, Barceleiro Mde O, Sampaio-Filho HR, Martins LR.
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18335734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Microleakage in class II composite resin restorations: total bonding and open sandwich technique.
    Loguercio AD, Alessandra R, Mazzocco KC, Dias AL, Busato AL, Singer Jda M, Rosa P.
    J Adhes Dent; 2002; 4(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 12236642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T, Lösche AC, Lösche GM, Roulet JF.
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Comparative evaluation of microleakage among three different glass ionomer types.
    Abd El Halim S, Zaki D.
    Oper Dent; 2011 Feb; 36(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 21488727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Influence of Hand Instrumentation and Ultrasonic Scaling on the Microleakage of various Cervical Restorations: An in vitro Study.
    Rohani B, Barekatain M, Farhad SZ, Haghayegh N.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jun 01; 18(6):437-442. PubMed ID: 28621270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement.
    Erdilek N, Ozata F, Sepetcioglu F.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997 Jun 01; 21(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 9484117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE, Farrag NM.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010 Jun 01; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Microleakage of four different restorative glass ionomer formulations in class V cavities: Er:YAG laser versus conventional preparation.
    Delmé KI, Deman PJ, De Bruyne MA, De Moor RJ.
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2008 Dec 01; 26(6):541-9. PubMed ID: 19025411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Microleakage at gingival dentin margins of Class V composite restorations lined with light-cured glass ionomer cement.
    Tjan AH, Dunn JR.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Dec 01; 121(6):706-10. PubMed ID: 2277155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. [Glass-ionomer cements in Class V restorations].
    Prati C, Fratamico FC, Piana G.
    Dent Cadmos; 1990 Nov 01; 58(18):60-4, 67. PubMed ID: 2097189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. In vitro microleakage of glass-ionomer composite resin hybrid materials.
    Rodrigues JA, De Magalhães CS, Serra MC, Rodrigues Júnior AL.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Nov 01; 24(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 10483445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Volumetric microleakage assessment of glass-ionomer-resin composite hybrid materials.
    de Magalhães CS, Serra MC, Rodrigues Júnior AL.
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Feb 01; 30(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 10356563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Resin-modified glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: a comparison of three in vitro procedures.
    al-Obaidi FF, Salama FS.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996 Feb 01; 21(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 9161211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Microleakage in different primary tooth restorations.
    Shih WY.
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2016 Apr 01; 79(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 26839288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Microleakage of composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations in retentive and nonretentive cervical cavity preparations.
    Kaplan I, Mincer HH, Harris EF, Cloyd JS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct 01; 68(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 1403938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Marginal leakage of class II glass ionomer-composite resin restorations: an in vitro study.
    Hirschfeld Z, Frenkel A, Zyskind D, Fuks A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Feb 01; 67(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 1538319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Comparative evaluation of the microleakage of two modified glass ionomer cements on primary molars. An in vivo study.
    Masih S, Thomas AM, Koshy G, Joshi JL.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2011 Feb 01; 29(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 21911952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Assessment of Microleakage Using Dye Penetration Method in Primary Teeth Restored with Tooth-colored Materials: An In Vitro Study.
    Punathil S, Almalki SA, AlJameel AH, Gowdar IM, Mc VA, Chinnari K.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul 01; 20(7):778-782. PubMed ID: 31597795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Microleakage of class V glass ionomer restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation.
    Delme KI, Deman PJ, Nammour S, De Moor RJ.
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2006 Dec 01; 24(6):715-22. PubMed ID: 17199471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.