These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
2044 related items for PubMed ID: 16116875
41. Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis. Jamieson WR, Fradet GJ, Abel JG, Janusz MT, Lichtenstein SV, MacNab JS, Stanford EA, Chan F. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1109-15.e2. PubMed ID: 19379975 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Four years' experience with the Edwards-Tekna bileaflet valve prosthesis. Calkavur T, Yagdi T, Apaydin A, Islamoglu F, Posacioglu H, Durmaz I, Ozbaran M. J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Mar; 11(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 12000170 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Long-term outcome after valve replacement with the omnicarbon prosthesis. di Summa M, Poletti G, Brero L, Centofanti P, La Torre M, Patanè F, Raggio JM, Sanchez FG, Maroñas JM, Torregrosa S, Valera FJ, Caffarena J. J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jul; 11(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 12150300 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population. Bottio T, Rizzoli G, Caprili L, Testolin L, Thiene G, Gerosa G. J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Decision-making in the choice of heart valve for replacement in patients aged 60-70 years: twenty-year follow up of the St. Jude Medical aortic valve prosthesis. Emery RW, Arom KV, Kshettry VR, Kroshus TJ, Von R, Kersten TE, Lillehei TJ, Nicoloff DM, Erickson CA. J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11 Suppl 1():S37-44. PubMed ID: 11843519 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. A 10-year experience with the Carbomedics cardiac prosthesis. Tominaga R, Kurisu K, Ochiai Y, Tomita Y, Masuda M, Morita S, Yasui H. Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 79(3):784-9. PubMed ID: 15734377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Clinical durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthetic valve. Oyer PE, Miller DC, Stinson EB, Reitz BA, Moreno-Cabral RJ, Shumway NE. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Dec; 80(6):824-33. PubMed ID: 7431981 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves. Gao G, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL, Furnary AP, Starr A. J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul 21; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement? Jamieson WR, Gudas VM, Burr LH, Janusz MT, Fradet GJ, Ling H, Germann E, Lichtenstein SV. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan 21; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis: a 7-year follow-up in 361 patients. Zussa C, Del Ponte S, Ottino GM, Pansini S, Zattera G, Morea M. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Aug 21; 34(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 2429394 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Eleven-year single-center experience with the ATS Open Pivot Bileaflet heart valve. Baykut D, Grize L, Schindler C, Keil AS, Bernet F, Zerkowski HR. Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Sep 21; 82(3):847-52. PubMed ID: 16928496 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Actuarial versus actual freedom from structural valve deterioration with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses. Jamieson WR, Burr LH, Miyagishima RT, Germann E, Anderson WN. Can J Cardiol; 1999 Sep 21; 15(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 10504178 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Experience with stentless aortic xenografts. Luciani GB, Auriemma S, Casali G, Barozzi L, Lamascese N, Mazzucco A. J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov 21; 9(6):794-800. PubMed ID: 11128787 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: time-related outcomes and risk factors. Alsoufi B, Al-Halees Z, Fadel B, Al-Wesabi A, Al-Ahmadi M, Joufan M, Siblini G, Canver CC. J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May 21; 19(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 20583397 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. The Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis. Comparison of early clinical performance in aortic and mitral positions. Jamieson WR, Pelletier LC, Gerein AN, Pomar J. Can J Surg; 1992 Apr 21; 35(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 1562925 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. [Early and late results of St. Jude Medical prosthesis in aortic and mitral portion]. Kuboyama I, Sese A, Masaki H, Kohda Y, Ueno Y, Imoto H. Rinsho Kyobu Geka; 1989 Aug 21; 9(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 9301945 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Clinical experience with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis: short-term results (from 2 to 4.5 years). Gallo I, Ruiz B, Duran CM. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Oct 21; 31(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 6196860 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Twelve-year experience with the 19 mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve. Nakajima H, Aupart MR, Neville PH, Sirinelli AL, Meurisse YA, Marchand MA. J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep 21; 7(5):534-9. PubMed ID: 9793853 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The mosaic valve clinical performance at seven years: results from a multicenter prospective clinical trial. Fradet G, Bleese N, Busse E, Jamieson E, Raudkivi P, Goldstein J, Metras J. J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Mar 21; 13(2):239-46; discussion 246-7. PubMed ID: 15086263 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]