These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


716 related items for PubMed ID: 16116876

  • 1. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
    Bottio T, Rizzoli G, Caprili L, Testolin L, Thiene G, Gerosa G.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement: predictors of adverse outcome.
    Kuwaki K, Tsukamoto M, Komatsu K, Morishita K, Sakata J, Abe T.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 12701788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Medtronic mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: investigational center experience to six years.
    Jamieson WR, Fradet GJ, MacNab JS, Burr LH, Stanford EA, Janusz MT, Abel JG, Germann E, Cheung A.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 15700437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
    Milano AD, Bortolotti U, Mazzucco A, Guerra F, Magni A, Gallucci V.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
    Mykén PS.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.
    Jamieson WR, David TE, Feindel CM, Miyagishima RT, Germann E.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 May; 11(3):424-30. PubMed ID: 12056738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
    Goldsmith I, Lip GY, Mukundan S, Rosin MD.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Fifteen years follow up with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
    Mykén P, Bech-Hanssen O, Phipps B, Caidahl K.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 10888100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses in age group 61-70 years.
    Prasongsukarn K, Jamieson WR, Lichtenstein SV.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):501-8, 510-1; discussion 509. PubMed ID: 16116877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements.
    O'Brien MF, Harrocks S, Stafford EG, Gardner MA, Pohlner PG, Tesar PJ, Stephens F.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):334-44; discussion 335. PubMed ID: 11380096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Seventeen-year clinical results of 1,037 Mitroflow pericardial heart valve prostheses in the aortic position.
    Yankah CA, Schubel J, Buz S, Siniawski H, Hetzer R.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Mar; 14(2):172-9; discussion 179-80. PubMed ID: 15792176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The potential for normal long term survival and morbidity rates after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Lund O, Magnussen K, Knudsen M, Pilegaard H, Nielsen TT, Albrechtsen OK.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 May; 5(3):258-67. PubMed ID: 8793673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Lack of durability of the Mitroflow valve does not affect survival.
    Houel R, Le Besnerais P, Soustelle C, Kirsch M, Hillion ML, Loisance D.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jul; 8(4):368-74; discussion 374-5. PubMed ID: 10461235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Five-year follow up of the ATS mechanical heart valve.
    Emery RW, Krogh CC, Jones DJ, Nicoloff DM, Blake DP, Arom KV.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Mar; 13(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 15086262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Aspire porcine bioprosthesis: ten years' experience.
    Hadjinikolaou L, Boehm MC, Ganner C, Kendall SW, Rosin MD, Goldsmith IR, Spyt TJ.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15700436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Allografts for aortic valve or root replacement: insights from an 18-year single-center prospective follow-up study.
    Takkenberg JJ, Klieverik LM, Bekkers JA, Kappetein AP, Roos JW, Eijkemans MJ, Bogers AJ.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 May; 31(5):851-9. PubMed ID: 17350857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Influence of patient-prosthesis mismatch on long-term results after aortic valve replacement with a stented bioprosthesis.
    Frapier JM, Rouvière P, Razcka F, Aymard T, Albat B, Chaptal PA.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jul; 11(4):543-51. PubMed ID: 12150304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Re-do aortic valve replacement: does a previous homograft influence the operative outcome?
    Kumar P, Athanasiou T, Ali A, Nair S, Oz BS, DeSouza A, Moat N, Shore DF, Pepper JR.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):904-12; discussion 912-3. PubMed ID: 15597580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Outcome after aortic valve replacement in young adults: is patient profile more important than prosthesis type?
    Klieverik LM, Noorlander M, Takkenberg JJ, Kappetein AP, Bekkers JA, van Herwerden LA, Bogers AJ.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):479-87; discussion 487. PubMed ID: 16901039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. CarboMedics mechanical prosthesis: performance at eight years.
    Jamieson WR, Fradet GJ, Miyagishima RT, Henderson C, Brownlee RT, Zhang J, Germann E.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Sep; 9(5):678-87. PubMed ID: 11041184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 36.