These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

780 related items for PubMed ID: 16134267

  • 1. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
    McLean ED.
    Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes.
    Dyke MC.
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
    Gottlich V.
    Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The right to die in Montana: the Montana Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act.
    Hunt WE.
    Mont Law Rev; 1993 Nov; 54(2):339-56. PubMed ID: 16180290
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Whose life is it anyway?: an analysis and commentary on the emerging law of physician-assisted suicide.
    Gaumer CP, Griffith PR.
    S D Law Rev; 1997 Nov; 42(3):357-98. PubMed ID: 16086516
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Peters PG.
    Ohio State Law J; 1989 Nov; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome.
    Brindisi TJ.
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1994 Nov; 23(2):619-44. PubMed ID: 16086514
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law.
    Bopp J, Avila D.
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cruzan and its sequelae: the Supreme Court decides its first "right-to-die" case.
    Obade CC.
    J Clin Ethics; 1990 Nov; 1(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 2132019
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment.
    Ouellette AR.
    Indiana Law J; 2004 Nov; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. In re living will.
    Havens SL.
    Nova Law J; 1981 Nov; 5(3):445-70. PubMed ID: 11649552
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cruzan: it's not over, Nancy?
    Shuster E.
    J Clin Ethics; 1990 Nov; 1(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 2132018
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The constitution and the right to die.
    Peters PG.
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1990 Nov; 6(4):13-6. PubMed ID: 16038075
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 39.