These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

249 related items for PubMed ID: 16139764

  • 1. Classification of technical pitfalls in objective universal hearing screening by otoacoustic emissions, using an ARMA model of the stimulus waveform and bootstrap cross-validation.
    Vannier E, Avan P.
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Oct; 27(8):669-77. PubMed ID: 16139764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An alternative strategy for universal infant hearing screening in tertiary hospitals with a high delivery rate, within a developing country, using transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry.
    Mathur NN, Dhawan R.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jul; 121(7):639-43. PubMed ID: 17112395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors.
    De Capua B, De Felice C, Costantini D, Bagnoli F, Passali D.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Feb; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12812130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions.
    Vander Werff KR, Prieve BA, Georgantas LM.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):669-81. PubMed ID: 17804981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in the first month of life.
    Prieve BA, Hancur-Bucci CA, Preston JL.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):330-9. PubMed ID: 19322090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL, Abouchacra KS, Zeki Al Hazzouri AG, Zaytoun G.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Test-retest reliability of the acoustic stapedial reflex test in healthy neonates.
    Mazlan R, Kei J, Hickson L.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 19322092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Otoacoustic emissions for newborn hearing screening].
    Liao H, Wu Z, Zhou T.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Feb; 34(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 12764789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Otoacoustic emissions and tympanometry screening among 0-5 year olds.
    Ho V, Daly KA, Hunter LL, Davey C.
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Mar; 112(3):513-9. PubMed ID: 12148864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Principal component analysis as a method to facilitate fast detection of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Parazzini M, Grandori F.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):249-52. PubMed ID: 12665039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Infant hearing screening: effects of timeline.
    Tsui PW, McPherson B, Wong EC, Ng IH.
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 33(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 18429859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A role for otoacoustic emissions in screening for hearing impairment and middle ear disorders in school-age children.
    Nozza RJ, Sabo DL, Mandel EM.
    Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):227-39. PubMed ID: 9201458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs.
    Benito-Orejas JI, Ramírez B, Morais D, Almaraz A, Fernández-Calvo JL.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Aug; 72(8):1193-201. PubMed ID: 18550180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions when screening hearing in preschool children in a community setting.
    Dille M, Glattke TJ, Earl BR.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Nov; 71(11):1789-95. PubMed ID: 17870187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emission levels with negative tympanometric peak pressure in infants and toddlers.
    Prieve BA, Calandruccio L, Fitzgerald T, Mazevski A, Georgantas LM.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 18469719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Newborn hearing screening and strategy for early detection of hearing loss in infants.
    Jakubíková J, Kabátová Z, Pavlovcinová G, Profant M.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):607-12. PubMed ID: 19185924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response.
    Suppiej A, Rizzardi E, Zanardo V, Franzoi M, Ermani M, Orzan E.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Screening for hearing loss and middle-ear effusion in school-age children, using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: a feasibility study.
    Georgalas C, Xenellis J, Davilis D, Tzangaroulakis A, Ferekidis E.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Dec; 122(12):1299-304. PubMed ID: 18423079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM, Feeney MP, Gates GA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Classification of trace patterns of 226- and 1000-Hz tympanometry in healthy neonates.
    Son EJ, Park YA, Kim JH, Hong SA, Lim HY, Choi JY, Lee WS.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2012 Oct; 39(5):455-60. PubMed ID: 22055507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.