These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
507 related items for PubMed ID: 16145810
1. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence. Roach CA. Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Cruzan decision -- a surgeon's perspective. McNoble DJ. Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(4):569-610. PubMed ID: 11652628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Deciding for others: New York law and the rights of incompetent persons to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment. Martino M. NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1996; 41(1):285-308. PubMed ID: 12718312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law. Bopp J, Avila D. Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Chapter 765 revisited: Florida's new advance directives law. Calder M. Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 20(2):291-365. PubMed ID: 16001475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Introduction: the right to die after Cruzan. Hoffmann DE. Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11651214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Exercising the right to die: a proposal for New York. Caffera SM. Syracuse Law Rev; 1991; 42(4):1189-240. PubMed ID: 16130264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome. Brindisi TJ. Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1994; 23(2):619-44. PubMed ID: 16086514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment. Ouellette AR. Indiana Law J; 2004; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Maryland Health Care Decisions Act: achieving the right balance? Hoffman DE. MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1064-130. PubMed ID: 12599347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Euthanasia and the right to die: Nancy Cruzan and New Mexico. Schwartz RL. N M Law Rev; 1990; 20(3):675-700. PubMed ID: 12186059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Constitutionalizing the "right to die". Mayo TW. MD Law Rev; 1990; 49(1):103-55. PubMed ID: 11656023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no? O'Brien EJ. Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty. Bopp J, Avila D. Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Cruzan legacy: legislative and judicial responses and insights for the future. Gieszl HC, Velasco PA. Ariz State Law J; 1992 Apr; 24(2):719-801. PubMed ID: 11654081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Looking beyond the law to improve end-of-life care. Zuckerman C. Generations; 1999 Apr; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17144036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia. Davidson SI. N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994 Apr; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The unconstitutional treatment of Nancy Cruzan. Gasner MR. N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1990 Apr; 7(Part 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 16044596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Decisions for the dying: an empirical study of physicians' responses to advance directives. Zinberg JM. Vt Law Rev; 1989 Apr; 13(2):445-91. PubMed ID: 11653869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]